Jane Eyre Movie vs Novel

1601 Words7 Pages
Literary Brilliance Invigorated By Theatrical Glamour The riveting, timeless, classical, and coming of age tale orchestrated by Charlotte Brontë is immaculately composed, modernized, and brought to life by Cary Fukunaga, endeavoring to portray the narration of an orphan exposed to the rigors of a cold, scornful, forsaken, loveless, dreary, desolate, and arbitrarily governed past. Taking place in the patriarchal Victorian society, the protagonist known as Jane Eyre sought refuge and embarks on the pursuit of acquiring her true autonomy, independence, and seeking a sense of belonging against conspicuously insurmountable odds, in this “rags to riches” masterpiece. Encompassed in this cinematographically astonishment is the juxtaposition of the essence and prowess behind a gripping and at some instances heart stopping romanticism between the plain-featured, reserved, yet talented, empathetic, hard-working, honest, and passionate archetype of Jane, matched with the wealthy, deceitful, self-centered, passionate, tormented, driven, charismatic, and brooding Mr. Rochester. Differing in appearance to society, and on the surface incompatible, the two seemingly star-crossed lovers mirror one another in terms of a passionate interior, enclosed in the mind and soul. Will Jane Eyre become the heir to more than skills at studying, drawing, and teaching? Can the dynamic love duo of Mia Wasikowska (Jane Eyre) and Michael Fassbender (Mr. Rochester) overcome their own pride in the juxtaposing mixture of romanticism and caste standing, incorporated into the beautiful, enigmatic, and amorous plot of Jane Eyre? Beautiful cinematography, accurate sets and costumes, well handled screenplay, and outstanding directing, assimilated with a strong portrayal of key characters and excellent acting is intransigently effective and fundamental in allowing the film to be lucrative and
Open Document