‘Outline and explain ways in which data about crime is collected’ Crime can be defined as deviant activities that break the law in any particular society. Finding out how much crime takes place isn’t easy, and attempts to measure crime can prove misleading. This doesn’t mean that crime statistics aren’t affective, but it does mean that no single measure can be fully relied upon. Many sociologists see crime statistics as a social construction, as collecting crime data is a result of the cultural expectations of society, and by understanding who commits crime and what sorts of crimes are committed, we can get a clearer picture of why people commit crime in the first place. Different sociologists have presented different theories and concepts to explain what drives a person to commit a crime, and research and statistics give us an idea of the type of crimes committed and the places that they’re most likely to occur.
But in contrast there are very different at the same time. The crime control model is used in the criminal justice system for the prevention of crime. The crime control does not exclude that is possible to make a mistake, but based on the circumstances of the laws, the person is considered guilty until her or she is proven innocent. This model is based on old fashion laws which allow rapid and speedy convictions despite the mitigating factors of the case and the victim. The results, of the crime control model are wrongful convictions, being over-turned and this is a major downfall in the criminal justice system.
Asses the usefulness of labelling as an approach to the study of crime and deviance In the study of crime and deviance, most approaches other than Marxists, suggest that there is a difference between those who offend and those who do not, and search for key factors that lead people to offend. However, there are a group of theorist who reject this idea and instead suggest that most people commit deviant and criminal acts, but only some people are caught and stigmatised for it. Although the labelling theory is quite prominent in the study of crime and deviance, there are endorsers and criticisers who both give valid accounts to why this theory should be, or not be taken as a valid theory. Labelling theory suggests that deviancy is a social process usually related to power differences but it doesn't explain the causes of crime. It does however explain why some people or actions are described as deviant, and can help in understanding crime and deviance.
We don’t focus on the real facts or even where it begin, nor does the media like to go all out for little crimes like, abandonment of a child etc. There isn’t a huge amount to exaggerate on there, so the problem is just brushed aside. With the use of technology such as television, books, magazines and news’s papers, we portray how we won’t crime to be seen, and what reactions we want. Rather then what it really is. And trying to help the real problems.
Organized crime is more complicated from crime. Without the desire of want and need from the public and pay whatever for the organized crime products or services the organized crime will never exist or successful. Organized crime is like a business they operate on what the customer wants or needs. The fact is the laws in place are not keeping the public off dealing with organized crime; those who want the illegal substance or activity are not shy to go the organized crime to gets it. The fact is that customers need to go through an organized crime group shows that because the American society has a need and a want for something, which is illegal.
In other crime types once the intent is created it is followed by the execution of the act. The intent and act is not misinterpreted. In contrast, due to the element of disguise in white-collar crime the intent is blurred and frequently can only be obtained by interpretation. (Stephen Rosoff, 2010) White-collar criminals can only be successful if the victim is ignorant and negligent. Key differences between white-collar crime and other types of crime is that white-collar crime generally requires the victim to comply in being victimized in contrast to murder, robbery, assault or rape.
Asses the roll of crime prevention in deterring criminal behaviour. No matter what culture is examined, crime is evident in all of them, it is for this reason that the governing body attempt to implement crime prevention in order to make society safer place, as well as cutting the cost needed to prosecute criminals. The two main categories of crime prevention are situational and social crime prevention. These two categories break down into many sub-categories, most notably CCTV as well as legal education . The first, and most apparent category of crime prevention is situational crime prevention.
It does all of this while still having all the elements a well-written book needs. Capote understood how to make his point in a way that would ‘get’ to readers. It is hard to understand how Bryson would come to a conclusion that the story is nothing but a true story. It is much more than that, and will not only inform readers about the infamous murders, but also give a little insight into the human mind. Whether you agree or not, is up to you, but there is no denying the hostility behind the murders and how two human minds thought it was worth
Durkheim believed that every society has some level of crime and deviance; a crime-free society is a contradiction of terms. Durkheim said ‘crime is normal, an integral part of all healthy societies.’ For Durkheim, not only did crime have negative aspects but positive aspects and functions of crime such as boundary maintenance and adaptation and change. In Durkheim’s view the function of punishment was is not make the wrongdoer suffer or mend his ways, nor is it to remove crime from society but to reaffirm society’s shared rules and reinforce social solidarity. For Durkheim there has to be the right amount of crime; too much will threaten to tear the bonds of society and too little means that society is repressing and controlling its members too much, stifling individual freedom and preventing change. Durkheim however offers no way of knowing how much is the right amount.
At the end of the day, social disorganization meets the measures of organized crime, it is totally not for the usual beliefs and set values by the public through the predominant law liberated for the safety of individual’s right or freedom. Unlawful behavior is commonly exist within the environment of social disorganization and finally street gangs possibly will develop as groups that will possibly have fundamental have connections with corrupt officers leading to their economic, social and governmental power. Because of those fundamental ins and outs, without a doubt the social disorganization for example in the circumstance of gang culture ultimately meets the standards for organized crime. In reality, it is evolution significantly completes the accomplishment of those measures. As argued, social disorganization and organized crime possibly will result in having similar economic, political and social objectives.