Is Religion a Force of Social Cohesion or Social Control?

467 Words2 Pages
Is religion a force of social cohesion or social control? By belonging to a group which worships a power beyond our own and regularly taking part in rituals and gatherings which requires devoted attention and commitment, it is easy to see why some may view religion as force of social control, from which an individual’s norms and values are regulated by a social system to meet its needs. Rather than a force of social cohesion, a system that creates bonds within society to maintain stability. Durkheim believed that one of the functions of religion was social cohesion; its main purpose was to create a community that of which was bound together by the collective consciousness of its members, sharing the same beliefs and values. And solidarity is maintained by the regular ceremonies and rituals provided through religious services, allowing the norms and values to be reaffirmed recurrently which is important when assuring these beliefs aren’t lost or weakened but rather reinforced by through social cohesion provided by religion. However Durkheim also believed religion had the function of providing social control to ensure that the norms and values based around religion were inherited to maintain control within society allowing conformity to exist. Religion would allow for a system which would teach its members how to act in society and live a righteous life, this is done by passing on beliefs and values through teachings of religious text and sharing these beliefs during rituals and communal gatherings. By having all its members believe they should all share the same norms and values it ensures that the views of religion are inherited providing social stability by controlling the views of its members. If society didn’t have a collective consciousness the system would collapse due to anomie which would eventually result in chaos and social breakdown, religion is
Open Document