This is unlike the conventional politicians. As well as this, when the leaders of the pressure groups are elected the turnouts are usually very low. Due to the leaders not being elected, this therefore means that they are unaccountable and the influence in which they exert in many ways is not democratically legitimate. This problem is made worse by the growing number of pressure groups being led by a small number of senior professionals. In some cases, the pressure groups even undermine their internal democracy as the minority (the leaders) voices are heard rather than the majority (the members).
This has received much criticism as unlike states these organisations operate without checks or balances and are difficult to control due to their flexible nature and cross-border activity. Marxists also point out that unlike nation-states government’s, companies are motivated by profits and self interest rather than a democratic government which is in place to serve the people regardless of self interest. However an argument in defence of the nation-state is that of nationalism most countries from the most
As with any type of voting, there are always uninformed voters who could potentially vote for someone for the wrong reasons. Also, there are times when the Fed must make split-second decisions, and having officers stick to an agenda wouldn't make these quick choices possible. Another argument is that the people who do run the Fed are bank officials who have much experience in the financial world. Why would we need anyone else?
One of the women he appointed was Nicky Morgan, who replaced Gove as Education Secretary. This power is important because the cabinet ministers are some of the key people in how the country is run as they are all responsible for their certain departments, therefore they have a lot of control over the key parts of life for example Education. Despite all these points, it is not the PM’s most important power as they are just cabinet ministers and he can appoint/sack as many has he wants, even though they are important for the economy they aren’t the be all and end all as they do not have as much of an effect as the outcome of the power where he can declare war. Another factor that comes under patronage is the appointment of senior ministers. The Prime Minister makes all
Whilst this system has many positives (it creates much stronger governments than other alternatives, for example), it is not as representative as other systems, and, because of its single member constituencies, it can lead to a lack of social and political representation. There is only one winner in each constituency, and if a candidate does not receive a majority their votes are effectively wasted, and the winner can often receive less than 50% of the votes, meaning that the majority of voters’ will be entirely useless. When this is combined
Additionally pressure groups can be defined as an insider or outside group; insider pressure groups will have well established relations with parliamentary officials and will be regularly consulted by government, outsider groups will have no specific connections within the political system and so try to influence decision makers though mobilising public opinion. Democracy is the description given to the political systems that are structured on the basis that the government should serve in the interests of the people, a democratic government is also expected to be fully accountable to its citizens. The UK lives in a pluralist system, which allows a wide range of ideologies to flourish as long as a group doesn’t break the law or threaten the security of the state or its people. Additionally a pluralist is expected to disperse its power and not concentrate it in a small number of hands. Pressure groups have had a positive effect on UK democracy.
Public policy is the result of group services that act against one another. There is not one group that will resistor for every group, and there will be an equal and differing. The larger the group is, the more influence the group will have. The policies are the product of negotiating and cooperation will usually tend to be reasonable, fair to all, and conductive to social solidity. Examples, Business Marketing Association (BMA), and Congressional Budget Office (CBO), are insider groups that are more powerful and are practically the part of the establishment.
There were also very few organisations that represented the working class, and any early trade unions that were affiliated with workers did not often concern themselves in politics. Furthermore it was evident that strict regulations were in place to ban strikes and any other industrial action. As a result of these circumstances it had not yet been possible for a labour party to form, and it is apparent that the workers were very poorly represented; it is even clear by the actions of the Liberals and Conservatives that they did not in any way favour the interests of the workers. They believed that there was no need for reform in an already stable political system. Undoubtedly, the first steps towards a working class achieving political power came from the emergence of Chartism.
Power of Suppliers The bargaining power of suppliers in this industry is low, as there are many suppliers. The required commodities like sugar, and water are basic goods that are available quite easily. So, producers have little power over the pricing hence the suppliers in this industry are weak. Also, the suppliers have almost no strength to integrate forward, so the threat from them is low. Power of Buyers End consumers and retail channels can both be considered as buyers in this industry.
Democracy means “power to the people” and Source A suggests that this is what is happening and the people are happy with the voting system. Whereas Source B suggests that the British people feel this voting system isn’t representative of the populations as “most people