If however Fuller is aware that its products are addictive to street children, it could as a morally conscientious company attempt to better educate regarding harmful effects of misuse of products and especially to the countries that are in high rate in poverty. H.B Fuller insisted that Honduras and Guatemala are ultimately responsible for the misuse of their products in the Social conditions. Fuller stated that the solvent-based adhesive serves rightful uses in shoes and leather; but are misused by children to get high. There are a large number of lawful chemicals that can be misused by addicts for example gasoline, medications, and alcohol, but this does not mean that they should be banned for our purposes. It is unreasonable to require a corporation to restrict genuine uses to prevent misuse and it is not fair to consumers who will pay the price for either higher substitutes or additives measured by manufacturers.
The essence of this statement is denying the possibility that free trade could bring positive effect to world’s poorest countries. So free trade is really a fair trade to poor countries?Actually, the main argument does not come from whether rich countries should open market to support the development of poor countries, instead, the focus is whether the liberalization is the burden of poor countries. The essay will critically discuss the statement pro and con by listing theory support and example support separately. From the pro angle, free trade is unfair to poor countries because poor countries has no competitive advantages in almost every sector and no absolute advantage means no trade according to related theory; From the con angle, free trade still could be in the interests of poor countries even though they have no absolute advantage because free trade offer more choices and lower price, in addition, poor countries could still develop comparative advantage according to supportive theory. The conclusion will be driven from the analysis below, which will finally regard free trade as a double-edged sword.
The reason for why governments in developing countries sometimes are unable or unwilling to implement polices that create favorable conditions for economic growth boils down to two main reasons: social issues and political issues. Political issues are just as multifaceted as the social issues. Due to corrupt governments and regimes the lawlessness spreads throughout the developing nation like wildfire. Political issues revolve around the basic needs of a nation such as simple, yet, necessary infrastructure of schools, hospitals, septic tanks, etc. The necessity of public goods is vital for a developing country to survive, maintain, and become what we consider today, a developed country.
Adequacy of Consideration Adequacy of consideration refers to the fairness of the bargain. Ordinarily, courts will not evaluate the adequacy of consideration, unless it is so grossly inadequate as to “shock the conscience” of the court—if, in terms of its amount or worth, it indicates fraud, duress, or undue influence. The con¬tract may be declared unconscionable. A BAD BARGAIN is not failure of consideration Court do not consider the adequacy of the consideration given for the promise – the fact that the consideration supplied by one party is slight when compared with the burden undertaken by the other is immaterial as long as 1. the parties freely agreed to the exchange III. Agreements That Lack Consideration A. PREEXISTING DUTY Under most circumstances, a promise to do what one already has a legal duty to do is not legally suffi¬cient consideration.
Again, as I stated before, main goal is to improve customer service. The best way to do it is to have the best employees. Active or Passive Diversity This is a little difficult question for me. Our world right now has a diversity of expertise, values, and languages. It might be better to use passive diversity for Tanglewood, because they want their employees to share close relationship between each other.
In my opinion, evidence based practice can be misleading because of the use of the word evidence. Just because it is called an evidence based practice does not mean it is a cookie cutter solution to every case or offender. The uses of these programs are going to depend on human intervention to ensure the program fits both the needs of the community and the needs of the offender. If the community does not buy into the practice or feel secure with the practice intention then it will fail. The same is true with the offender, if they do not have full buy in or are placed in the wrong program that does not meet their needs
Likewise it is not fair for a person that is innocent and is pressured to plea bargain for the believe that he or she will most likely not be considered not guilty. This will still affect them in the future will jobs and society. Works
Competition is relegated to activities that are do not affect the hiring or promotion of employees. This effectively denies an employer the opportunity to examine the individual merits of an applicant, unless one presumes race and genders are “merits.” This can have drastic negative consequences on morae, as workers lose motivation to improve. As former Governor of California Pete Wilson said, “What's the purpose of preparing our children to compete and win in the marketplace if the marketplace itself is governed by laws that discriminate against the most qualified in favor of the less qualified?” (Jabbra, 2000) The mere fact that minorities are underrepresented does not mean they are being unlawfully discriminated against. If one were to look at the National Basketball Association, one could not deny the overwhelming lack of non-blacks in the league. Does the NBA seek only to hire black males by artificially creating an environment that precludes whites, Hispanics, Asians, and other non-black athletes?
The immigrant identity is clearly portrayed as inviting exploitation and prohibiting the family from succeeding, but the family fails to realize that the American identity is similarly problematic and offers just as little opportunity for freedom and success, but for different reasons. In short, the poison in the air is the effect of American capitalism, which implicitly pits the poor against each other in the search for work and the need to maintain that work regardless of how denigrating or dangerous it is. However, the family does not realize this at first, and fails to recognize that buying into the idea that hard work alone will bring human rights and success is just as naive and makes them just as exploitable as relying upon the goodwill of the wedding guests to help pay for the cost. When Jurgis is still naively invested in this notion, he asks “do you want me to believe that with these arms […] people will ever let me starve?” (Sinclair 23-24). Jurgis believes that his physical ability for labor will be enough to ensure his and his family's success, but this is just as foolhardy as the belief that holding on to their Lithuanian wedding tradition could shield the family from the ravages of American capitalism.
Likewise, sex or sexual labor is not exchanged in the prostitution contract. The invasion of an individual's will to be a heinous violation of fundamental human rights. The concept of property in a person conceals the relations of power and dependence that exist between those who pay others to do their will, and those who get paid to do someone else’s bidding. Prostitutes arrive at their position out of a concern to challenge the very serious civil and human rights violations, and they wish to promote greater equality and freedom. The author uses Chapkis's