This is supported by the Othello by William Shakespeare and A Streetcar Named Desire by Tennessee Williams. Both literary works show theme of deception and characterization that convey the critical lens. If a person does a wrong thing he/she should try to fix it before it’s too late. If they will not take any steps to fix it, it will eventually affect them in a bad way. Both literary works showed how a person did a wrong thing and it has caught up to him/her.
Oedipus is a mythical Greek king of a city named Thebes, he fulfills a prophecy that said he would kill his father, and thereby brings a disaster on his city and family. Okonkwo, on the other hand, is a wealthy and a well respected warrior of the Umofian clan, a lower Nigerian tribe who gives effort to develop into a powerful and successful person, nevertheless ends up self murdered and doomed as an evil spirit. People still argue about who is a worthy example of a tragic hero, but despite their similarities, Oedipus is a better illustration of a tragic hero. To begin with, Oedipus flaw cause him to lose his family and eyes. As Oedipus was striving
It is believed that to an extent, Othello was responsible for the tragedy that unfolded in the play; this can be partially agreed but not to a whole as this can be shown throughout the text of Othello with the manipulation of characters flaws conveyed in the play. A.C Bradleys review on this Shakespearian tragedy is that, he believes Othello is a tragedy of character, and each character is built up on the knowledge of another. Shakespeare uses textual integrity through his understanding of the human condition the shape every act into the pertaining outcome. Body: Quoted by A.C Bradley in section 3, “Evil is displayed before him, he sees it, in itself almost irresistible, aided at every step by fortunate accidents and the innocent mistakes of its victims”, this symbolises Iago and the actions he shows to Othello, being helpful when help is needed from him. Othello then sees and claims Iago to be ‘honest’ throughout the play and believing all the lies that is told to him.
In an essay he wrote about his play Death of a Salesman, Arthur Miller argues that a tragic hero is not necessarily one who is noble of birth. However, the tragic hero must have these traits: he must suffer, be doomed from the start and his decline inevitable, be basically noble in nature, and have free choice to some degree. Also, his inevitable fate must result from a tragic flaw, and his story must arouse fear and pity. If these qualities are truly what makes a tragic hero, then it can be said that Ethan Frome is a tragic hero, and, therefore, that his story is a tragedy. This can be said because Ethan Frome meets every requirement listed by Miller.
Arthur Miller’s The Crucible is a timeless tragedy, depicting historical figures but concerning the modern world as well. John Proctor, the protagonist, though fitting several of the characteristics of the Aristotelian tragic hero, is actually a much more complex tragic hero. The primary differences between John Proctor and the classic tragic hero are obvious, such as the lack of noble birth, his not being in a position of leadership, and the inevitability of his fate. These differences are necessary, as Arthur Miller attempts to convince his audience that his protagonist is an everyman and is worth sympathizing for. In Arthur Miller’s more complex world, a more complex tragic hero is needed.
The use of events within ‘Romulus, my Father’ also allow us to view Romulus himself as a sort of tragic hero, since his fatal flaw is being too trusting of people’s karacter. The novel depicts Romulus as a unique character, who has a deep sense of integrity, yet this integrity ironically destroys his soul. He is wise, yet in a sense illogical since much of his judgement takes place on an irrational basis. The novel not only uses the idea of a romantic tragedy, but also takes other forms such as eulogy, bildungs roman and biography. This use of shifting language modes represents Raimond himself changing, both in pace of the story and his opinion regarding his father.
Luck is often thought of as the bringer or good or bad fortune. The events that luck can bring may be favourable or unfavourable depending on the situation. Fate is considered a person’s destiny or what the future holds for them. In this play, Romeo and Juliet are victims of poor fate and bad luck. Most of Shakespeare’s plays focus on the theme of tragedy that is clearly represented in this play (Hamlet, Orthello, Macbeth etc…).
With the death of Macbeth, William Shakespeare shows an insight of a perfect example of a classic tragic hero. Despite bending a few rules, Shakespeare illustrates that if a character is not held by fate, causes their own downfalls and realizing it was their own fault, they are what many call a tragic hero. Being a tragic hero isn’t limited to just stories or plays, but can be applied in the real world as well. Richard Nixon was thought to be a great man, but after following the same road Macbeth had taken, they both found themselves destroyed by guilt, and are now considered, “Tragic
Romeo also implies he feels something bad is going to happen which will ultimately end in his death. 5,1,6 “I dreamt my lady came and found me dead” dramatic irony is found in this quote as Shakespeare was trying to hint the audience that something bad is going to happen. In conclusion, disobeying authority or it can have bad results is an important theme of Romeo and Juliet. Nevertheless, authority is not the main message, love and fate are as important as
Romeo and Juliet is a play made up of unwise decisions. Fate or unpredictable events did cause some complications, but character choices actually determined the outcome. The characters are responsible for the tragic ending and death of many people. Different decisions made by the Montagues and Capulets, Romeo and Juliet would have changed the end of this tragedy. The first people who could have changed the tragic story would be the Capulets and the Montagues.