Into The Wild Ecocriticism Lens

1028 Words5 Pages
Into the Wild Lens RN Throughout the novel, Chris McCandless differs from majority of the other characters in that he is an ecocritic, while most of the others focus on “green studies.” As the plot progresses, Chris encounters more people who chose to voice their opinions on his plans to go to the wilderness, and most of them do not have the greatest faith in him due to their views on the environment. As he tells of his time with Chris, it becomes evident that Gallien supports the “green studies” and focuses on how dangerous and threatening nature can be to a person. For example, Gallien states, “Alaska has long been a magnet for dreamers and misfits, people who think the unsullied enormity of the Last Frontier will patch all the holes in their lives. The bush is an unforgiving place, however, that cares nothing for hope or longing” (Krakauer 4). The manner in which he chooses to first make Alaska sound like an “unsullied” place that dreamers are attracted to, and then demolish any hope for the Last Frontier actually being able to help an individual find themselves by calling it an “unforgiving place,” makes it seem as though he were once one of those dreamers. What if he was once a “misfit” who looked to the wilderness as well? It could be that he simply was unable to ever “patch all the holes” in his own life, which turned him bitter toward nature. It may have been that Gallien was once an Ecocritic with a bad experience with nature that forever changed his state of mind. Gallien points out that people will, “…get to thinkin’ ‘Hey, I’m going to get on up there, live off the land, go claim me a piece of the good life.’ But when they get here and actually head out into the bush – well, it isn’t like the magazines make it out to be. The rivers are big and fast. The mosquitoes eat you alive. Most places, there aren’t a lot of animals to hunt. Livin’ in the bush

More about Into The Wild Ecocriticism Lens

Open Document