The Reign of Terror: Justified or Not? The Reign of Terror, a year-long bloodbath of the French Revolution, was it justified or not? Was there actually a reason why the Reign of Terror was necessary? Well, in fact, there was a reason it was necessary for the revolution. Although the Reign of Terror did not protect the rights of man like the starters of the French Revolution wanted, it helped secure military victories for the French against external enemies, quelled the counterrevolution that was stirring in France due to nobility and clergy, and the speaking prowess of political leaders, such as Robespierre, helped convince the common peoples to join the Reign of Terror in extinguishing external and internal enemies of France.
Louis Napoleon claimed that sovereignty of the people was his first priority, but it is obvious that his authoritarian rule actually came first. However, The Bonapartist regime became a little more liberal in the 1860’s as Louis Napoleon became more lenient on press censorship, he allowed for open debates to take place in the parliament. He also began urban renewal and development projects in Paris and constructed railways which encouraged and created economic development. He appeared to be a very reliable and suitable emperor, but his main downfall was his terrible decisions when it came to his foreign policy which ultimately led to his demise. France was in a bad state after the revolutions of 1848 which was sparked, because the King Louis-Philippe and his ministers refused an extension to the franchise.
I agree to an extent, that Bloody Sunday was the most important cause of the 1905 revolution because it acted as a trigger for the revolution, however there are other factors to be taken into account, as Bloody Sunday was also caused by economic factors, political factors, social factors and other short-term events, such as the Russo-Japanese war. Economic factors played a key role in causing the 1905 Revolution. One economic factor that helped cause Bloody Sunday was Witte’s economic reforms; he placed extra taxation on the peasantry and encouraged the rapid growth of towns and cities. The extra taxation led to great resentment from the peasantry who began to support radicals such as the SRs, who played a part in the 1905 Revolution. These taxations also led to strikes and demonstrations becoming commonplace so could have caused Bloody Sunday itself.
When this happened there were enormous hopes for reforms benefiting the working and middle classes, the major instigators of this revolution, but Louis Philippe quickly became a severe disappointment by resorting to corruption and repression to maintain and enforce power, and by turning a blind eye to the rising tide of urban migration and poverty. Instead of establishing a republic, like many had hoped, the July Revolution resulted in the establishment of yet another monarchy. Among the first acts of Louis Philippe was the proclamation of
Explain why Liberal Reforms were successful in appealing to the working class? From the emergence of new Liberalism after Gladstone, the concern for a healthier workforce and the strive to get more votes from the working class, the Liberals had to pass certain reforms that appealed to people like children, workers, sick and elderly. These reforms were overall very successful, as they were start of collectivism in our society and an end to the laissez faire attitude that the government once had. Liberals were very successful in achieving a significant degree of social change in Britain and paved the way for the establishment of a welfare state. The competition with other countries like America and Germany influenced our politicians to look deeper into the society and solve the social and economic issues that weakened our nation.
It discouraged governments from spending public money on welfare services. The liberal reforms brought about much needed change within the welfare state. Such as in the late 19th century the workhouse conditions were made more humane. This was the beginning of the various areas of social welfare provision such as public health, housing and education. The inter war years had an impact on the liberal reforms as the government promised to provide for the British people as this was used as a motive during the war.
On top of which the working class was expected to pay heavy taxes to finance the governments running. This obviously led to the feeling of resentment within the bourgeoisie who wanted a more equal system of governance in France. From this point of view they were the forerunners of the whole revolution but there was another side to this social awakening and that was the decrease of importance in the belief of God. The political discontent of France was one of
This shows that Alexander was ready to liberate Russia because even though it was risky, it helped to start the liberalisation process because it enabled ex-serfs to work in factories which would help boost the economy, let the gentry to earn their own money and would help advances in industry which in turn help Russia to compete with the western world. However the aftermath of this manifesto was a lot more negative than first appears. Although Alexander helped to abolish Serfdom there were a lot of negatives
In fact, these moderate reforms were a means of keeping political order. Laws regarding the reduction of working hours for young people in factories also helped in placating the growing socialist groups. While these moderate social reforms were taking place, they would have been more numerous and perhaps radical were it not for the structure of the constitution keeping any excessive
Outline the Ideas and Impact of the Main Philosophers. How important were they in Starting the French Revolution? The French Revolution was a result of many factors, one being the combination of philosophy and social theories. The period before the French Revolution was called ‘The Enlightenment’ which was a period where new ideas were spread throughout France often criticising absolute government and the injustices of society. The philosophy of the Enlightenment was supposed to open the eyes of the world’s poor and free them from unjust rule.