The primary mission of the due process model is to protect innocent people from wrongful conviction. It is doubtful that many would argue against the fact that we must engage in significant efforts to protect those who may be falsely accused. However, many argue that while the due process model focuses upon the rights of the accused it ignores the rights of victims. due process model does not limit itself to the Fourth Amendment. The police must also consider the individual rights of the accused in respect to many of the individual rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights.
We all decide d that police officers should have the ability to use force, but not in all situations. It is best said by John Anderson, “The difference between the quasi-military and the civilian police officer should never have enemies. Individuals may be criminals as well as, have a violent streak, but they are not enemies that should be ruined. Once that kind of language gets into the vocabulary, it begins to change attitudes.”(Anderson 1985). We as citizens of the United States ask the question is justice created equally and is justice for all?
If our houses are being searched and we are not aware of it than the government can search whatever they want. In a covert search warrant, there are often no limitations on what can or will be searched (Sneak and Peek Warrants). U.S. intelligence agencies monitor virtually all electronic communication and collect so-called “metadata” which is a form of collecting all personal information at once (England). The Patriot Act is for the benefits of american citizens and to prevent terrorist attacks. Some may argue that The Patriot Act is to benefit the american citizens and to prevent terrorist attacks.
The federal government has deemed it necessary to investigate anyone that seems in any way suspicious in the way of terrorism. This extends from illegal search and seizure to allowing any future cell phone or computer usage to be watched without a new warrant. Civil liberties activists claim that this, again, is an infringement on Constitutional rights while others claim this is a necessary infringement to protect our communities and people. Another issue with the expansion of the executive branch is the cooperation on a local, state, and federal level. The argument is that police are too involved in the legal aspects of collecting evidence, while intelligence agents are too uninvolved.
Both of these functions are important for the protection of the public safety and the operation of the system. Adjudication is one primary focuses of the courts today. This means that the courts have to decide who is going to have to answer for a criminal act. If there wasn’t adjudication, prosecutors would be filing charges in vain. Courts play an important part in determine who is and isn’t guilty.
All states and the federal government have laws establishing victims’ rights. As a matter of fact, victims’ rights should not be placed on the back burner because there is a language barrier. Criminal justice administrators are always looking for creative and cost effective ways to deal with language barriers that derive from serving a multicultural population. Victims’ rights usually apply to victims of felonies which are the more serious crimes. However, some states also grant rights to victims of misdemeanors.
Winston turned a switch and the voice sank somewhat, though the words were still distinguishable. The instrument (the telescreen, it was called) could be dimmed, but there was no way of shutting it off completely. (1.1.3)” So don’t be surprised if the FBI shows up at your door because you searched something that the NSA can consider an act of terrorism. In all of this info just realize that the government has complete control of its citizens no matter what the constitution says they have what they think is considered a high power. These ideas are great but can be wrong in the wrong hand.
If we are truly concerned about our safety, our right and our duty to protect ourselvesand all that we love and stand for, then we must be able to own and knowledgeably operate the kinds of firearms that will allow us to do just that. Admittedly, there is the growing concern with regard to assault weapons getting into the hands of non law abiding persons (criminals and drug dealers). However, we must be confident that with better regulations with regards to ownership of assault weapons and with better enforcement of these regulations we can keep assault weapons out of the hands of those who intend to use them to harm others. When every assault weapon is banned, the only ones left with guns are the criminals. WORKS CITED Robertson v. Baldwin, 165 U.S. 275 (1897) United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939) District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570
The American prison system is referred to be a means of punishment that serves no encouraging purpose and placing the economy further into financial suffering. Many others trust that the prison system is warranted as it guarantees society protection from those who create a serious threat to those who abide by the laws that govern. No matter what one may believe, our prison systems population is continuing to produce at such a high rate many professionals have debated on what future steps need to be taking in order to improve such a problem. An in-depth discussion regarding the concerns legislation has with doubling the prison sentence for those who commit armed robbery, the rapid population growth the correctional facilities throughout the United States are encountering, the negative effects caused by long-term incarceration, alternative means for punishments, such as the use of intermediate sanctions and community-based corrections, my personal recommendations, and reasoning for the recommendations. Several methods exist in contemporary American that can be used in the criminal justice system, and can be agreed upon for punishing an individual.
Courtney Hale ENG 111-D11 Essay #3 Informative report Professor Alphin 11 March 2014 They Have Eyes Everywhere The Constitution of the United States protects the freedom and privacy of American citizens. Americans have the right to privacy and to live without scrutiny from the outside world, as long as no illegal act is done. Police in the United States cannot eavesdrop on a person without a warrant from the court. Until recently, it was required that law enforcement agencies had to file a warrant before doing any surveillance. This has all changed after the September 11th terrorist attacks.