The Conclusion – now that you have an outline, try to restate some of the main parts, and consider the implications of the work you have done Restatement of thesis: In conclusion, technology impacts our life in the social, economic, and personal life since it consists of the imprisonment due to social networks, the censorship due to mass media, the proliferation due to military technology and international trades. Summary of main points/ideas: Questions, applications, implications of argument: The provided arguments state the current situation of the impact of technology nowadays; however, our main concern is its future status. Will it worsen or stay in its status quo? Are people aware of this phenomenon or are they inattentive of its danger? Is there any solution that might reduce or hamper its spread?
Lack of clarity of purpose can be a risk and a legal issue leading to disputes. The major legal principle here is that, companies should always endeavor to clarify and understand each and every clause of the contract so that they know what they are committing themselves too. It lessens on the misery caused during times of disputes. No matter how easy and simple it may appear during the contract signing process, it becomes totally complicated to understand and agree upon a common interpretation of ambiguous clauses when disputes come up. For instance, in the simulation given, there were ambiguous clauses like “ordinary requirements change” which became a source of conflict because the software user and system requirements changed over time which were had to just incorporate into the contract because of the big effect they had on the project costs and
Ethanol is a healthy alternative to oil. Using food crops to produce oil aids our independence but, it also has the potential to drain our food supply, especially in a time of emergency. All these things give example of the many ways hemp oil could potentially replace our dependence on foreign oils and propel us into more eco-friendly options to sustain our daily lives. The plant would benefit people if we were to let it thrive and have taxes on different productions. The author closes by saying the government is preventing farmers from growing hemp for any reason and spends four billion dollars a year trying to keep it
Never have I seen a bag of spinach or a head of broccoli that was advertised as “buy one get one free.” This is due to the fact that if all of a sudden healthy foods were as cheap as unhealthy foods, people would “vote” differently. Farmers would start having to produce more healthy foods, for which they are not subsidized, advertisements for those “fun foods” would need to change to appeal those healthy eaters, and nutritionism would prove that food in its natural form is what is needed to acquire optimal
Some believe that it’s not as big a concern as others while some believe we are rapidly destroying the planet. As for my personal thoughts on the issue of human overpopulation; I believe people need to be better educated on birth control and the environmental effects of overpopulation. There is a serious need to correct the air pollution and fossil fuel depletion and my hope is by doing so there will be less of a need for wars in order to gain others natural resources . We also need to find a way to fix the depleting fresh water supply because once it’s gone all living things are going to suffer
In industrial countries, they destroy habitats in order to maintain their standard of living. But in developing countries, habitats are destroyed to support an increasing population and to increase financial success. As humans, they tend to care more about their needs and their ability to survive rather than the needs and concerns of the environment and its species. If mammals and their habitats are in the way of their financial success, I am certain that they would not hesitate to remove them from their paths. Habitat destruction is an important issue for many organizations and individuals.
Nuclear Energy Is Not the Answer BCOM/275 19 June 2013 Nuclear Energy Is Not the Answer In the race for a greener world, nuclear energy will not be the way. Fossil fuel is polluting the world and killing the ozone, but there are many other solutions to a greener earth than more nuclear plants. As nuclear plants pop-up throughout the world, so do the hazards that company them. The world knows that pollution is slowly killing the plant, and one solution offered to slow down this decay is building more nuclear power plants. Peter Schwartz and Spencer Reise state nuclear power to be the best option to pollution and the earth’s ozone decay.
The context discusses in depth how technology can limit human interaction, in-turn affecting the development of social experiences. The purpose of technological innovation is to change the world and provide convenience and functionality. However, does the extent to which technology is used help or hinder our society in relation to human interactions? The increase of dependence on technology has created a form of laziness within society, limiting an individual for thinking for themselves. The world should not be created to have technology run it solely; humans should be more involved with processes that are in their control.
These issues cause many rifts in a successful society and workplace and often prevent goals of the organization and the teams within from accomplishing their goals and achieving their missions. Most importantly, leaders must be aware of these challenges in order to rise above them and lead successful teams, while also reaping the many benefits that diversity provides. References Author Unknown. Mind Tools. 1996 – 2013.
Why was our country so docile and accepting of such horrible food choices that were causing obesity, health issues, and in many ways contributing to the skyrocketing health care costs? I do not buy these unhealthy processed corn and soybean products and instead buy organic, whole foods. But it is expensive to make these choices, so some of this anger got projected towards Monsanto. But a good dose of it goes to the social injustice aspect of this issue: everyone should be able to afford healthy foods that do not harm your