English 67 Comparison Sample Essay I Give It An “A” Many people argue that the book is always better than the movie. They will tell you that the written page offers something that the cinematic one can't, that a movie always leaves out details that the book contains, and that key elements of the original story are often missing in the film version. And these book lovers are often right. But in the case of Nathaniel Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter and Will Gluck's Easy A (which is loosely based on Hawthorne's novel), the latter speaks to the modern audience in ways the original never saw coming. Yet, they share two very similar heroines, and offer messages about what it's like to be an outcast.
With the internet and all of its limitless features, one is given the opportunity to freely speak their mind without having to face his/her antagonist. It really is about the contrast between censorship and the freedom of speech. Many would say that Ray Bradbury’s main purpose of writing Fahrenheit 451 was not in fact to satirize censorship, but to talk about mankind’s dependence on media (Ingram 1). Despite this reality, much of the basic and metaphorical aspects of the story are based upon the idea of censorship. In the world of socially blind fireman Guy Montag, people’s state of mind was to employ firemen to burn books rather than to put out fires.
The book is a cautionary tale about what happens when books are Forgotten or actively suppressed, and it forms one of its own best arguments in favour of the book as a keystone to intellectual freedom. The society it describes is a dystopia, but unlike other famous dystopias like 1984 and Brave New World, the book holds out some hope, however fragile and tentative. Fahrenheit 451 is a deceptive book too; it's a quick read, and it seems to be about people burning books. Fahrenheit 451 begins with a famous opening line: "It was a pleasure to burn" (33), a line which resonates
But no matter what happens, nor how bad the situation is, by the end of the novel, everything seemed to resolve its self. This can apply in every day life. If you keep persisting and striving to go forward, the situation will no doubtly turn around in your favor. Whilst discussing the issues which were found in the novel, James Maloney also used many forms of literary techniques which helped emphasize a situation or even a character. He used descriptive writing and even juxtaposition which really helped the reader to paint a picture in their minds about a situation or a character in the novel.
Beatty is full of all this knowledge and starts telling Montag the background of firemen. Beatty says Benjamin Franklin was the first fireman and around the Civil War was when they started burning books. (34) Then he tells Montag how classics were cut to fifteen minute radio shows, and then cut again to fit a two minute book column because all people care about is the ending. (54) Montag is just taking everything in and Beatty keeps rambling on. Now Beatty tells Montag why the public lets comic books stay but not the books.
In chapter 7 of book one, Winston is talking to a man about life before the revolution and questioned “the claim of the Party to have improved the conditions of human life” (p93). The Party has weakened the people’s minds with “doublethink” and if their minds are weak, they can not challenge the Party. In this case, if no one can remember life before the revolution then there can not be any challenges towards the party. No one can say that the Party has truly failed in the current conditions. The Party has successfully done this by altering history in the form of rewriting books and documents.
Altogether, Guy Montag’s change in heart towards books is a blessing. He realizes that his society lacked a hunger for knowledge and wants to do something about it. The true theme in the novel, “Too much mindless entertainment,” proves it is necessary for any society to have the knowledge of the past, which is recorded in books. It can prevent man from making the same mistakes as in the
In Go Carolina he is singled out as a student with a speech problem and has a lot of problems accepting it. In another essay he finds himself at an art school trying to get other to accept his art. I also loved the tone in which Sedaris told his stories. While telling the stories of real-life events that could be very heart-felt, he still managed to enlighten them with a little humor. Every serious story led to another joke that kept begging me to keep reading.
Coronel 1 Mario Coronel English 203 Mrs. Hoeflinger December 1, 2010 Premature Burial The History and Social Impact When someone reads or hears about premature burial they often attribute it to literature or a fictitious idea created by the media. What people don’t know is the dark side of this issue often written about by authors such as Edgar Allan Poe who are known to write about macabre subjects. Premature burial has been around as long as people have discovered that you can bury the dead, which is around the time of the Neanderthals. The terror of being buried alive can never be described in words even by the most skilled
Cormier initially introduces reality v appearance which is echoed through the rest of the book. Francis is informative at the beginning seeing this quote “My name is Joshep Francis Cassavant and I have just returned to Frenchtown in monument and the war is over and I have no face”. Francis points out his name, where he lives and the fact that his face got blown off. He reveals three insignificant facts in the first sentence show he is a disturbed character .Furthermore, Francis states “oh, I have eyes because I can see and ear-drums because I can hear but no ears to speak of, just dangling bits of flesh”. The narrator uses lexis,”oh” which has a very casual connotation.