What activities, events, or decisions are likely to stimulate further growth of this organization? Why? Apply the current APA standards for writing style and citing references. M5_A1: Discussion: Metaphors and Terrorism 27 June 2012 1. The United States Department of Defense defines terrorism as “the calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological,” (Feith, 2004).
The fact that officers know that illegally obtained (but true) evidence will quite possibly be thrown out, and therefore dangerous criminals will be freed, will encourage them to follow the proper procedures. (Woodfin, 2009) In addition, there are already several exceptions to requiring a warrant, such as “stop-and-frisk”, airport and school searches, voluntary searches, and emergency situations (Scheb, 2008) While these arguments supported the continued use of the exclusionary rule, there are also many argue against its value to our criminal justice system. One of the most
Crime Scene Investigations When working a crime scene there are many steps that must take place in order for any investigation to hold up in court. A proper investigation can take hours but the end result can lead to a conviction of the guilty and justice for victim’s families. The first officer at the crime scene should do everything they can to keep all evidence in its original state. The crime scene must be blocked off immediately to avoid any contamination or loss of evidence. Boundaries should be established as to how far out or each area of the scene that needs be secluded.
Finally, a police officer can conduct a “search incident to arrest” without a warrant. This means that during the course of a lawful arrest — one that’s based on probable cause — the police can search the arrestee and the immediate surroundings for weapons or for evidence the police fear might be destroyed.” These indicate that police officer has rights to conduct the search without the warrant in certain situation, it’s for protected the law and the safety of the community also for protects the suspects themselves. (http://www.gasawaylongandfarmer.com/information/criminal-defense-faq/Can-Police-Conduct-a-Search-Without-a-Warrant_AE12.html) There is case called Michigan V. Fisher. In this case a police
Handling evidence properly is one of the most crucial points of any investigation. Without even intentionally doing so, mishandling of evidence could mean a case thrown out of court. Some types of mishandling of evidence would be planting of evidence, removing evidence, not following the chain of custody and unlawfully obtaining evidence. Rape cases should involve specially trained individuals, if an untrained investigator was to handle a rape case the way a homicide case was handled even more issues can arise. Reducing Ethical Considerations From arrival at a crime scene the investigator must follow only the facts and remove any emotion from considerations.
It can be argued that the Manhattan project was first conceptualized by a group of physicist, which included Italian physicist Leo Szilard, who feared that atomic research performed by Germany could essentially materialize into a weapon of catastrophic power. With this in mind, the visionaries attempted to inform the United States’ President of the possible impending doom; unfortunately their warnings were not headed (Davidson 2010). It wasn’t until Leo Szilard spoke to Albert Einstein, a scientist with celebrity like status and political influence, that a letter was drafted which eventually informed Franklin Roosevelt of the possible threat (Gosling
Q: In your opinion, which non-lethal tool on a police officer’s belt, either the taser, pepper spray, or the night stick, is best for handling the most dangerous suspects in a confrontation? A: I think all officers have under gone training to make that decision during confrontation depending on the threat to the individual, themselves and the public. All weapons can do damage if misused it’s up to training institutions to provide proper education and the officers themselves to use their discretion. Q: Do you think tasers are too powerful to be used to disarm or bring down a suspect? If yes, what if it was a last resort instead of using the gun in a non life-threatening situation?
The arguments for police pursuits remain few and simple. It is the idea that police pursuits remain necessary for the apprehension of persons suspected of committing serious offenses (Pape and Pipes). It is the idea that some people just need to be caught and put into custody. Also that since there is “no single method to avoid all pursuits” (Eisenberg and Fitzpatrick), something is going to have to be done about fleeing suspects. If officers are not allowed to pursue, then they would end up letting everyone that does not cooperate go.
The purpose also is if law enforcement was to take the evidence it would not be used in the court of law unless issue or that person can be set free of all charges. Basically one wrong moved can make us lose a suspect of a horrible crime if we are not careful. Law enforcement just need to be cautious so they are doing their jobs correct, and setting a person free will get them into trouble (cjlf.org, 2011). When we are identifying the exclusionary rule it is a great rule to have so police have to stop and think. Police have to think before they search because it could cost them a lot if they just do what they want.
Arguably, under the Terrorism Act it was made possible for the police to stop and search persons if there was belief that they were likely to be involved in some sort of terrorist activities. Prior to the implementation of this section, the police could only stop and search individuals if they had reasonable grounds for suspicion and certain criteria were met. This specific section of the act makes the issue of suspicion irrelevant with regards to carrying out searches. There is also the argument that the stop and search policy has led to racial profiling. In carrying out such searches, the act suggests that officers must take particular care not to discriminate against members of minority ethnic groups in the exercise of these powers.Consequently,