How successful was Gladstone’s first ministry? If ‘achieving what you set out to do’ defines successful, then Gladstone’s First Ministry was certainly a success. The Acts that were passed during his time as leader of the Liberal party had great impact on the population both then, and in some cases, still now. However not all his Acts were well received and this created some controversy. Gladstone’s main goal was to pacify Ireland and he was the first British politician to tackle the unfair way in which Ireland was run.
There are many ways that Gladstone’s First Ministry could be considered to be successful. Firstly, Gladstone had a passion to pacify Ireland, this was because he feared other countries would use Ireland as an invasion base to attack Britain. Also Irish nationalists called Fenians tried to seize power of churches, which lead to the ‘Disestablishment of the Anglican Church in Ireland 1869’ The terms of the act allowed the church to govern itself as it was no longer legally established by parliament. It was seen as so liberal it was radical and extended the principal of religious liberalism to Ireland. Another successful act passed involving Ireland was the ‘Irish Land Act 1870’ Tenants were now given compensation for eviction and there were limitations of landlord power, it was a step to improving Ireland, even though it was not as successful as the previous act, and had more opposition as Irish nationalists wanted British landlords to leave Ireland completely.
Converting religions to satisfy his country demonstrates that Henry was willing to put the beliefs of his own country before his. Also, Henry ended the war between the Huguenots and the Catholics. Ending the war between the two religions was a huge success because religious power was such a big deal during his time at heir. The choices Henry made during his power in France classifies him as an evident politique
The Earl of Warwick was the now surviving male heir of his uncle, Edward IV. In this sense, it is accurate to say that Lambert Simnel potentially posed a serious threat to Henry in 1486 because Henry was new to the throne. The fact that Lambert Simnel was able to draw in both local and foreign support for his challenge to Henry, again gave it the potential to be a very serious threat. The support initially came from the Earl of Kildare in Ireland who proclaimed Simnel as Edward VI and even crowned King in Dublin. Further support for the plot came from Margaret of Burgundy who provided both funding for the expedition and 2000 German mercenaries to Ireland, including the highly skilled military leader, Martin Schwarz.
This view is largely accredited because Pitt came into office in a difficult time but events around him seemed to benefit him rather well. Britain was entering the industrial revolution at the time, industry rose up and trade would boom due to expansion of the industries at home and abroad, the advancements of technology meant that Britain was going through a natural change that arguably Pitt was able to captain through leading to better fortunes. The natural opposition from the Whig party against the king led by Charles Fox meant that Pitt naturally had the Kings support against any opposition which could be thrown at him, the king would back him up. The American Revolution and his lack of connection to it meant that he was seen as a new politician not one of the previously failed governments who’s lack of control and rule in a situation. And lastly the regency crisis of 1788 meant that Pitt could use this to gain favour with the king and gather support from his own party and draw it away from the opposition.
‘An effective alliance was the key to successful warfare.’ How far do you agree with this assessment for the period 1792 to 1945? Firstly, I will focus on successful wars which were fought by alliances; therefore backing up the assessment. One of the most prolific wars of the period which was won at least partially due to an alliance was the First World War. The First World War was backed completely by alliances, with two ‘sides’ forming; the British, French, Russians and later the Americans on one side, and the Germans, Austro-Hungarians and Ottomans on the other. Until the Americans joined the War, Germany had managed to move forces into Belgium and Western France, increasing the pressure on Britain because for the first time it became apparent that the War was even closer to home than had at first been perceived.
Many countries and people probably did as well. On paper it appears that England would win without a doubt; they had all the means necessary for a victorious win over the colonists. When people come together to fight over a common cause, it is amazing what can happen. This is proven true by the outcome of the War for Independence. America won not because they had better soldiers, more supplies and weapons, or better fighting styles.
Target A01a: Ability to recall, select and deploy historical knowledge accurately, and communicate knowledge and understanding of history in a clear and effective manner. Target A01b: Ability to present historical explanations showing understanding of appropriate concepts and arrive at substantiated judgements. (2007) ‘Without the outbreak of the First World War, the Easter Rising of 1916 would not have taken place’. How far would you accept this statement? Introduction The Great War was critical for a number of reasons, not least for providing the opportunity to Irish Republicans seeking to rebel against British rule in Ireland.
The spectacular continental expansion Westward and the advent of new technologies during the industrial revolution were rapidly allowing for new concepts and new propositions. The widespread recognition of Social Darwinism provided Americans with a sense of moral superiority – an obligation to assist backward cultures and seemingly ‘remedial’ civilisations all over the world. The Monroe Doctrine remained a bold international statement of American authority, and the new ‘Manifest Destiny’ represented action and divine guidance. America was brimming with optimism, frustration, chivalry, hope and action. Despite McKinley’s attempts at diplomacy, he was feeble opposition to the emotional magnitude of what was emerging in America.
But, the Spanish-American War had significant historical significance. The success of America put many European powers on notice that The United States had become a world player. For Americans in may have provided a sense of union, the United States had come together and actually became a unified Union, this was a relieving sensation considering the tragedy of the Civil War. U.S. pride rose while nationalism and jingoism soared to new levels, the county was uplifted and a nation. I guess the consciences of the county was that America had defeated the Spanish Empire, and with its doctrines like the Teller Amendment it had showed the world that advancement to better mankind could be made thru anti imperialist