How Have Social Scientists Explained The Relation

1455 Words6 Pages
During this assignment I will be looking at what knowledge is and how social change has affected it over the years, answering how social scientists have explained the relationship between the two. Providing evidence to back up the statements social scientists have used to explain the relationship and the effect. For this assignment I will be looking at the theory the knowledge society in relation to medical knowledge with its strengths and weaknesses, to explain how social scientists have explained the relationship between the two. Knowledge is a complex thing. It has changed and developed over the centuries changing within different societies and different groups of people for them to produce different kinds of knowledge, showing that knowledge is not static. The definition of knowledge in the dictionary is what one knows, the body of facts that have accumulated over time, a range of information and understanding. There are two definitions of knowledge, subjective knowledge which is the knowledge that depends on one’s personal experience and objective knowledge, which is the knowledge which it is claimed, is completely independent of whoever happens to describe and classify it. As we can see knowledge is not static and is affected by social change. Knowledge is also subject to agency and structure which surrounded and constrained the pursuit in knowledge. Social change is a change small or dramatic that has affected the society or economy either locally or globally. The knowledge society is a term used to describe those societies in which knowledge is the motor for social, economic, cultural and political development and change. It describes and explains the importance of knowledge and contemporary societies. This theory uses the new changes in technology and marketing giving us greater access and speed to knowledge. The arguments for this theory is that as
Open Document