The early approaches to film history looked at how the technology of cinema has evolved which mostly ended up being a dictionary of technological advancements; this is useful in understanding the history and evolutionary progression of film but doesn’t really look into the subject matter of early films as much as it does the forms of them. A more traditional film history approach is the critical approach. In this approach a number of subjects are studied with the main areas being technology, aesthetics, business and the audience of the time. This approach can have it benefits as it allows more of the subject matter of films to be looked at but can have it limitations as it is quite a rigid form or analysis. Another form of approach to film history has lead to many film historians self publicising themselves, using it as a way to take credit for advancements of early film through various publications.
Generating fractals can be an artistic endeavor, a mathematical pursuit, or just a soothing diversion. However, FA is clearly distinguished from other digital activities by what it is, and by what it is not." Fractal art is expressive, creative and takes a lot of effort and intelligence. People think that the computer does all the work, but in reality it does do a great amount of it but the artist must choose the way the fractal will form itself. It’s an experimental form of art as well.
• Evidence: animation is so closely based on live action focus so it reduced job of animator to trace live image (de-skilling of labor) • Some of the animators could get work done with little skill but limited artists • Got in way of possibilities of the medium for some o Also influenced realistic human figures in Snow White, although most of it was not actually rotoscoped • Effect: • When snow white interacts with animals, she has a very human look, so our interpretation of her changes • Tension between medium to be realistic and replicate live action or is it trying to reproduce what's on comics where human figures don't need to be realistic • Recurring characters: better for larger audience and merchandising of products (create recognizable characters to build a brand) • Koko: developed to showcase the rotoscope • Popular because he was suited to silent film era: mischievous qualities best expressed through visual gags • Info had to be communicated through visual means because language was limited in what it could do • Betty Boop : became first cartoon sex symbol • Underwent dramatic changes as a result of Hayes code • Belonged to era of sound film: sung in films • Because simple novelty of sound • Tied to jazz era: • 1932 mini the moocher • Hayes code: adopted in 1930 but not seriously enforced until 1934 • Difference with other studios: more concerned having characters fit with their time (more timely rather than longevity) • More concerned with impact of characters and retired characters when they believed their time was done, then pass torch to the next character • Betty Boop retires: both with Popeye's to pass the torch • Jazz age and betty boop o Koko suited to silent film era, but Betty created for sound film era o Novelty of sound led to many animated cartoons featuring singing and characters playing musicl instruments • Used to be
Most results of these attempts indicate that intelligence can be at least temporarily and partly improved. The computational attempts mentioned in the book were designed to test one or few capability. I think intelligence included many kinds of abilities, such as memory, recognition, and understanding. The results of these attempts can only prove that some competencies of intelligence can be at least temporarily and partly improved, other than the intelligence can be improved. In my opinion, although it is hard to say whether intelligence is limited or not, intellectual abilities are differ from people.
To solve this problem the developers usually release two versions of the same movie. A rated one for more mature and young audiences and an unrated one, which usually consists of vulgarity every few seconds. ! The consequences of censorship can be devastating to some people but not all. Some negatives of this are that it works against creativity, and it may intrude the privacy of some people.
This adds another layer to their conflict. The filmmakers aren’t afraid to get political in another regard, as the picture also capably tackles the pros and cons of isolationism, a sentiment some would extol in this country. As much as I appreciated those elements of the screenplay, I did not like two others that represent the major problems with the film in my book. First, I would describe the characters here as two-dimensional. They’re not caricatures, but nor are they fully fleshed out.
Because we have to analyze movies, it helps us to understand what the movie is about. Analyzing an entire movie is to divide parts or fundamentals in the direction of to agree on the basics or indispensable features of a motion picture. It also transport elsewhere out of the important essentials within the aspect accordingly at the same time as to recognize causes, key factors, achievable outcome, in addition to provide the real meaning of analyzing a film. Their are many movies, everyone have a favorite movie that they adore, but a lot of citizens do not be acquainted with a great deal of endeavor is position into producing a high-quality film. Clear in our minds everyone do not really see the aspects of the movies that we are watching, nevertheless it plays in the overall of the movie.
For the length of a movie, we are transported to another place, time or even galaxy or imaginary world. Film seeks to entertain, scare, educate, enlighten, or even anger us, but the average person will just view a movie, and accept it at face value. We as a rule don’t seek out, nor take the time to fully analyze a film. This is not to say that we don’t perhaps consequently acknowledge and understand the point they were trying to get across to us, but we don’t go into depth in our head to scrutinize it, and break it down into segments. The typical person does not give much thought to the behind the scenes elements of a movie.
This is done for several reasons which include the idea that an addition to the movie may enhance the story. *The book has more information about the story while movies are shortened and with less information. Also, for what the producer and director believe will enhance the entertainment aspect of the film, they made add information that was not at all seen in the book. So people should read the books before they watch the movie. The other aspect of the book vs the movie is the instant ability to re-read passages that at first the reader did not totally grasp.
The success of a new film can be defined as either commercial success or critical success. Commercial success is more important to mainstream films, whilst critical success is more important to independent films. A good film script for a mainstream film will be simplistic and predictive so that it appeals to mass audiences. Also the film script will belong to a clear genre and will have a structured storyline. If the majority of the population finds the script of a film to be unclear and hard to understand then they will give their friends that feedback and so people won’t go to see the film, which is especially bad for a mainstream film as they cost millions to produce and rely on commercial success.