Once all the main factors are evaluated, it becomes clear that the life of the peasants did not improve so it remained uniformly bleak throughout the period of 1855-1964. For majority of the period, the living conditions for the average peasant remained uniformly bleak. Especially when considering 1917, under Nicholas II, accommodation was often a low standard as demand outstripped supply following an influx to the cities, such poor living conditions had a detrimental effect in their quality of life which was also the same under the communist leaders, where living conditions remained in an equally bad, if not worse when compared to the Tsars. Some may suggest that Nikita Khrushchev did try to improve the living conditions by building more social housing but he was more interested in competing in the Cold War than improving the living conditions of the peasants. Therefore, lack of care led to his housing policy to be unsuccessful and proving that live of the peasants under Khrushchev did not improve.
After the crash of the stock markets, the demand for agricultural goods during WWI disappeared, and as a result, rural areas of America experienced severe adversity. Banks prevented farmers from obtaining mortgages, and due to this countless businesses failed. Overproduction begun to take place in major businesses and factories, due to the fact that workers could not afford the products they helped manufacture. Numerous banks failed, and many
With a lack of communication on both sides and an unhappy country, it would have been very difficult to govern such a hostile environment as no members of public would have followed the laws or asks of their leader. Finally, the diverse economy makes laws very hard to put into place because certain introductions are going to benefit some whilst disadvantaging others e.g. The introduction of taxes for the rich to pay for the peasants would not have gone down well with some, but helped others back into a quality of life. For the above reasons, Russia was extremely hard to govern in the 19th Century. “Why was Russia so hard to govern in the 19th Century?” Russia was so hard to govern in the 19th Century due to the political situation, angry people and diverse economy.
But obviously its not. On the other hand, this industry is still necessary. There are thousands of horses who become crippled, and cannot be put to any use. Many others are in just such bad shape no one wants them, which is a sad thing to see. Others are just at the end of their days, and owners cannot
Many could not pay their taxes or other debts because their farms could not grow any crops. Many had to sell their farms for no profit. The area that this happened was called “The Dust Bowl” (Causes Of The Great
This meant trade to other countries went down bringing the economy to yet another low and this lack of agricultural workers meant a lack of food across Russia, especially in towns and cities where there was no easy access to farms; and as is with most things in demand, the prices went through the roof, leaving peasants starving on a mass scale. The only short term fix that was established for this whole issue, was a series of loans from Russia’s allies, Britain and France; these loans are especially important when it comes to the provisional government’s role in the second revolution in 1917. The other major issue that was gained from the World War is the amazing show of incompetence from Russian military leaders, most notably Nicholas II. This led to a decreasing
As Strayer, Gatzke, and Harbison state in their textbook The Course of Civilization states “The basic trouble was that very few inhabitants of the empire believed that the old civilization was worth saving… the overwhelming majority of the population had been systematically excluded from political responsibilities. They could not organize to protect themselves; they could not serve in the army… Their economic plight was hopeless. Most of them were serfs bound to the soil, and the small urban groups saw their cities slipping into an economic decline.”(DBQ 2, Doc 1) What these men mean is the majority of the people (which were poor serfs) were excluded from political responsibilities. In addition, they could not protect themselves or serve in the army mainly because they were too poor (in order to be in the army, the people had to be wealthy) and the urban patricians saw their city fall into an economic downfall. What also led the downfall of the Western Roman Empire were the rise of Christianity and the large size
It can reduce soil fertility and damage the overall structure of the soil. The lack of organic matter makes it crumbly and more likely to be washed or blown away, the soil is then unable to retain much or any moisture, resulting in lack or crops or grazing material. Ensuing a vicious cycle for the soil. Over-irrigation is an extreme issue as over-irrigated land can cause salinisation, creating impermeable and infertile salty crust in the surface. As this is a key feature of desertification it then means that the land for both these reasons is not able to be used and causing desertification to spread.
The lack of school material, clothes, or even living in terrible conditions can lead to the not reaching their full potential due to the lack of motivation. The government in 2012 released 3.5 billion dollars to The Native American Reservations, which for 350,000 people is equivalent to 1000 dollars (Volz, “$3.4B Indian Lawsuit Ends, Disbursements to Begin”). However, how far might this money go in a struggling household? The insufficient environment that Native Americans live in is nothing like we might find in any cities in the Northwest. The lack of motivation caused by years of not having a job and watching your family suffer in poverty is a condition that not too many of us are familiar with.
The Problems facing Russia before 1905 In the early 20th Century the Russian Government faced many problems, all of which were down to several things. From things that could not be solved, such as the population of the Russian empire and the size of Russia, the Tsarist Government ended up with a lack of effective control this is what led to their eventual downfall. Firstly, the size of the Russian Empire was massive and would have caused problems for the Tsarist Government anyway without anything else. Russia crossed two continents during the rise of power, but many parts of the Empire were un-populated. This brought many different cultures into Russia.