This is partly due to a combination of factors of which are poor planning and tactics, African American violence and a lack of federal government support. The major reason that the campaigns in the north weren't nearly as successful was due to the lack of federal and local government support, something which was integral to the success of many of the southern campaigns, notably Birmingham and Little rock. The relationship between Johnson and the organisers of the movement was strained because of disagreements over the Mississippi Freedom summer in 1964. Also, King made errors in declaring his stance over the Vietnam War, as he stated that he was anti-war supporter. This would hinder the chances of success in the Northern campaigns because Johnson refused to back and involve himself any further in the campaigns.
This also gives the police the chance to brutalise the blacks which would damage the image of black people as the white citizens wouldn’t want to help the black if they are involved in violence. So Malcolm X use of violence would lose him supporters for his campaign, which will decrease his campaigns popularity and so the federal government would have no reason to support the demands of the black civil rights. Another organisation also worked to introduce the idea of self-defence. The BPP argued that black people needed an organised defence as they could not trust the police or the US justice system. According to Huey Newton a leader of the BPP the police ‘occupied’ the black ghettos, so the BPP organised its own peoples’ army who patrolled black neighbourhoods
In 1964 the Civil Rights Act was passed and in 1965 as did the Voting Rights Act. Federal law made segregation and discriminatory voting illegal. However there remained issues like the failures of the existing political structures to absorb AA voters, shown by the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party failing to be accepted at the Democratic Convention. Failures like this frustrated some AA campaigners to the extent that they formed more radical groups. Black Power movements that included the Black panthers couldn’t be ignored if progress continued to be delayed.
The introduction of the Black Panthers, which dominated a vast section of the Black Power movement, could arguably be accused of hindering the civil rights movement. They produced much negative influence in their more violent methods. Their intense emphasis on separatism, self defence and Black Nationalism could have debatably caused further racial tension due to its polarising effect of the black and white communities. This could be seen as a regression of the movement and although it is what the Black Powers wanted it did not have the desired effects. The Black Panthers were also consistently accused of encouraging a gang mentally across America.
He was arrested more than once for resisting the government. His view on just and unjust laws was that an unjust law did not harmonize with the moral law- it just was not right. Martin Luther King Jr. did not want to "evade or defy the law as a rabid segregationist would", but he did not want to stand there and let the government do him and other African Americans wrong; therefore, he broke only the unjust laws, and he did so openly. Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. were two men fighting against unfair laws peacefully. Peacefully is the key word.
His teaching could not be as effective because he neglected the influence the white members would have on the movement, by resenting them as a race, therefore handicapping his popularity and likelihood of success within the various white communities. MLk’s method prevailed here because he was trying to change the people as well as the law, Malcolm sought to fight but failed to realize that it is impossible to fight a war when the government and all other forces are behind you
In this letter King proclaims that the laws of the government against blacks are intolerable and that civil disobedience should be used as a tool of freedom. King's audience also includes the U.S. citizens and the world. King disagrees with social injustice, but he is also trying to defend himself and his organization, Southern Christian Leadership Conference, from the government that disagrees with his movement for civil disobedience. He also wants to change public policy and bring the civil rights movement to national attention in order to increase the likelihood that his actions will cause good outcomes. King speaks almost as a "holy" advisor because of the fact that he is a minister.
Mao’s concern over Lin’s ambitions made their relationship weaker but grow with concern and rivalry, which eventually led to his fall from successor. Lin Biao’s fall from power increased when he and Mao started disagreeing on policies in 1970. Both had different views surrounding whether Mao should abolish the post of State Chairman in which Lin Biao tried to persuade him to keep the position in the CPC. Mao became even more suspicious of Lin Biao’s ambitions as Biao was normally passive and compliant towards Mao, which led Mao to believe that Lin wanted to become this position himself. This alerted Mao as he thought if Lin achieved this power within the hierarchy of the CPC, it would leave him on the sidelines and would hinder Mao’s image of a powerful leader of China.
There were many reasons why he failed to satisfy the revolutionaries and it shows why one after the other it led to a disaster. After the constitution was brought in, the changes were bound to come as people wanted certain rights like equality; the people didn't want the monarchy to end but just some changes in it. This new constitution limited and controlled the king's power, which is exactly why the king was not very pleased with, although he was a weak king he still wanted his power, but there was not much he could do about it anymore. So one of the reasons of Louis failing to satisfy revolutionaries can be his weakness, attitude and inefficiency on his decisions. It took 2 years for agreement to be reached on all of the details of the new constitution.
Therefore he would not listen to other wise diplomats, such as Talleyrand. His ego and ambition got in the way of common sense and this helped to lead to his downfall and he tried the impossible, like invading Russia. Napoleon's method of enforcing his rule and ideas on all the countries he defeated also helped turn countries against him. This is because they did not always like the French way of living and this caused the people to feel bitter towards Napoleon. There are also a couple of larger factors that led to Napoleon's downfall.