How Far Do You Agree with the View That the Rebellion Posed a Threat to Mary

1289 Words6 Pages
It can be argued that the various leaders and gentry involved in Wyatt’s Rebellion, further corroborates the claim that Wyatt’s Rebellion was a serious threat Mary’s hold on the throne. The rebellion originally involved groups of rebels from Kent, Herefordshire, Devon and Leicestershire in which a series of coordinated uprisings would act against Mary’s marriage to Phillip (and some argue the Catholic interests it brought along with it). From these numerous locations, leaders tried to coordinate large numbers of rebels, however the success of this is only limited. However, the leaders involved were significant in the level of threat of the Rebellion. Source 3 alludes to Sir Peter Carew, being the supposed leader of the Devonshire group. Carew had connections with the French, and as the French saw this as an opportunity to be against Spain, deliberately perverting this English-Spanish alliance, they were very likely to intervene and support the rebels. To such a degree, it can be argued that with Carew as a leader, and even the main initiator of the risings, and his connections to an Imperial force, the threat was very serious. However, with hindsight we can know the French did not support the rebels through its risings, and as Source 1 suggests, Carew thus failed dismally. Other leaders likewise had a prominent role in heightening the threat for example, the Duke of Suffolk as mentioned again in Source 3, who was determined to depose Mary in order to make way for his daughter Jane Grey, however, he was ineffective in rallying support in Leicester and thus his threat to Mary was very much limited. Sir James Croft (also referred to in Source 3) was in control of raising rebels in Herefordshire. He played a significant role in introducing the Protestant liturgy in Ireland and thus, as Mary was a Catholic Queen, Croft was able to rally support through Protestant
Open Document