This had a massive impact on the country as it had successfully stopped civil and political unrest which had previously been threating the harmony of the country. As it had been seen as a progressive force on behalf of ordinary people it received strong support from peasants and workers alike throughout the country. It also proved to the country that Chiang was an able diplomat resulting in higher public support. Nevertheless they were unsuccessful in entirely removing the warlords which meant there was always a constant threat of the warlords reforming and taking power once more. Although there failure of completely vanquishing the warlords there can be little doubt that Chiang was fairly successful in solving this domestic problem and the effects it would have on the country as it is probably that without him stabilising the political and social unrest civil war would have broken out in the country much early than it did.
Samuel said this because he took Ann's baby without Ann knowing so he decided to "punish" himself in a way Ann would feel pleased. This is loyal because he did what it took to make everything right. Samuel was also loyal to Captain Smith in a couple ways. The first way he was loyal was directly serving him some food." After services I bring Captain smith some food"(48).
It’s absolutely important for us to maintain full accountability in the Marine Corps because not only are we under-funded, which makes replacing lost gear a huge hassle, but it instills discipline in our Marines and helps them build a stronger character by maintaining full gear retention at all times. When a Marine keeps full accountability of issued gear, it illustrates to that Marine’s peers that the Marine is squared away. The more squared away the Marine is, the better off he/she will be in garrison and in country. When a Marine shows that he can take care of himself and keep full accountability of his issued gear then that Marine demonstrates the ability to take care of his other Marines as well look out for their well-being. When a Marine keeps full accountability of issued gear, then he/she will have fewer things to worry about and will be able to concentrate more on the mission that needs to be completed.
the Germans wisely selected ridges and high terrain for fortified defences the higher ground chosen gave the Germans tactical advantages and much better living conditions. The French British and the Canadians dug their trenches in lower terrain that was usually only a few feet above sea level so they got the rats mud lice and the worst of it. Reality set in when the trenches were dug that it was going to be a long war any chance of it being over by Christmas was dashed. While it is true that the start of World War One was greeted with vast amounts of patriotism throughout Europe and the Empire, there were those who were pacifists and refused to have anything to do with the war. The pacifists were few in number (the UK had about 16,000 in total during the war) and would have had no impact on the number of fighting men Britain had in the lead up to conscription.
Additionally, Vladek often found meticulous jobs in the camps in return for food and supplies for his admirable talent; even if it was for the Nazis. For instance, after Vladek taught the Guards English, he was allowed to choose whatever supplies he considered necessary, and was presented with an enormous amount of food; on these special occasions it would allow Vladek to regain hope in his survival. Word spread fast about Vladek’s “talent” that even the Gestapo, who sought to have their boots repaired, approached Vladek. Although Vladek was not a skilled in the arts of shoemaking, he was capable to exchange a ration of bread to have an experienced shoemaker fix the boot, who gladly announced to Vladek that “for a day's ration of bread I can fix anything!” (Pg.61). Returning with a perfectly sown boot to the Gestapo, Vladek was rewarded with a whole sausage for his exceptional work.
“Every man who really loves America will act and speak in the true spirit of neutrality, which is the spirit of impartiality and fairness and friendliness to all concerned.” This quote by Woodrow Wilson shows that he did not want to be part of any war, but rather remain neutral and isolated from others’ affairs. Wilson joined the Great War after this neutrality speech and America suffered many casualties as a result. In order to not have any more unnecessary deaths for conflicts of other countries, Wilson again decided to adopt an isolationist policy in the United States. Adopting an isolationist policy would also boost the economy because Americans would be forced to purchase domestic products. To encourage isolation, the Treaty of Versailles
Home front is defined as a term commonly used to describe the civilian population of the nation at war as an active support system of its military (not only mobilization of soldiers, but civilians too). There are lots of ways of “active support”: • Civilians are encouraged to work harder, longer and with more enthusiasm, with the aim of providing army with qualitative ‘resources’ in general (food, clothing, weapons etc. ); • Civilians are making concessions including food, food rationing (less meat, more vegetables; no food wasting; simple recipes and making meals with the smallest amount of ingredients possible etc.) supported by government ; • Civilians are there to praise and give full support to their army and the army officials, and hate opponents; so, it is always a moral boost for the soldiers on the front, and encouragement for other people to join the fight; propaganda and censorship were used by the government to “shape the mind of nation”; All the great European powers – Germany, France, and Britain had the capability of waging war on a unique scale. These countries could mobilize
Emancipation could be said to have been a success morally as it gave serfs the right to be treated humanely from higher classes. Source B coincides with this referring as Serfs conversing with their masters as ‘equals’. However, the emancipation could be said to have not fully been respected all, thus some members of the nobility still treating serfs inhumanely. Source B describes the ruler they need as a man ‘who understands life’ this suggests their needs were still not fully met. Emancipation of the serfs could be said to have had military success as the Russian army gained soldiers who were better trained
The success of the Bolsheviks in the Russian Civil War was due to Lenin, Trotsky and their combined political, social and military capabilities as they were experts. They introduced various political and military policies that enabled them to raise support in Russia and create a dominant and successful military force. Both leaders showed immense dedication to the socialist cause and in doing so provided ruthless and brilliant leadership that ensured Bolshevik victory in the Russian Civil War. Peasant support for the Bolsheviks was a result of the Whites political and social faults. Firstly, the Whites treated the peasant class harshly, they did not see the advantage of gaining the support of the larger lower class as about 82% and they did not take full advantage of that.
Being in the military for a few years know I seen good leaders and I seen great leaders. A few bad leaders as well. A good and great leader have one thing in common that makes them a success if not exceed in success. That knows there jobs and finishing a duty and/or task that will help if not complete the mission at hand. A good leader doesn’t have to know manuals by heart, only that they know how to reference material and complete a task complete and with mission complete rate at less above 95 percent.