How Does Language Affect Culture

1257 Words6 Pages
To, Daniel Chandler Subject:- review on your article on the Sapir Whorf hypothesis Respected Sir, The Sapir Whorf hypothesis is a conception of how differences in the language affect the way people cerebrate because of which the users of different languages will incline to cerebrate and react differently to different people predicated on the language they are utilizing. This hypothesis has two areas, i.e. the vigorous and the impuissant version. The vigorous version determines that the language effects the linguistic categories and that it circumscribes the cognitive demeanor. Whereas the impotent version determines that linguistic categories effect noetic conceptions and certain kinds of non-linguistic deportment. First the conception of this hypothesis was presented by the 19th century cogitators and then in the early 20th century of American Anthropology which was led by Wilhelm Von Humboldt who had a conception that language is the spirit of the nation. Edward Sapir embraced this conception, his student Benjamin Lee Whorf was optically discerned as the primary adherent of the hypothesis because he broadcasted observations of how he had descried linguistic differences in human cognition and demeanor. Whorf’s conceptions were largely reprehended, Roger and Eric had taken a decision to endeavor this hypothesis by taking a test, they had developed Whorf’s principle of linguistic relativity (the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis) and conducted more experiments cognate to colour perception varying between people who verbalize different languages. As the study of universal nature of human language and cognition was recognised, the study of linguistic relativity was not recognised and was dishonoured. Since the 1980s, an incipient group of linguistic relativity philomaths have studied the effects of differences in linguistic categorisation on cognition and withal
Open Document