| | |- be considered metaphors because the word or words used are not taken literally | Note: When the distinction is made, it is the following: when A is used to refer to B, it is a synecdoche if A is a component of B and a metonymy if A is commonly associated with B but not actually part of its whole. PART 3: SUMMARY 1. Which one is the most appropriate definition of metonymy a. Metonymy is the use of comparision of one thing with another. Metonymy is the use of word or phrase to indicate something different from the literal meaning. Metonymy is the use of the name of one thing to substitute for that of another to which it is related.
Not all nonverbal cues are appropriate. Some people use all capital letters to express yelling. Some of the nonverbal cues that can be used such as capital letters and bold writing might be taken the wrong way. I have written in all caps before not expressing anger but because I didn't realize it until it was already sent and the person who I sent it to asked why was I yelling and angry. You have to be very careful how you communicate through electronic devices.
Set the passage off in quotes, or indent it if it is longer than a line or two of text. c. Choose a sentence, phrase, or passage that reiterates what you stated previously That's Correct! Citing the source and page number and setting the passage off in quotes (or indenting it if it is longer than a line or two of text) are requirements for including verbatim information from an outside source. Question 2: Which of the following is a potential consequence of plagiarism? a.
Negative is when there is lack of eye contact, negative facial expression such as frown or yawn, body language of crossing arms and tones voice. Communication is not clear and is easily misunderstood. Always remember paying attention to non-verbal and verbal communication, put distracting thoughts aside and avoid being distracted. Responding by summarizing what the sender is trying to send the receiver. While responding, assert your opinions in a respectful manner and treat the sender like they would want to be treated.
However, priming introduces a fluid aspect to studies of cross-cultural usage of pronouns since specific context can induce favorability toward either collectivist or individualistic mindsets (Oyserman & Lee, 2008). This tendency to either segregate or connect appears to interact with interpersonal assessments. Perceived reasons for individual behaviors by members of individualistic cultures are more likely to result from judgments based on ascribed attributes or traits, while those made by members of interdependent cultures are more apt to incorporate contextual or situational elements (Church et al., 2006; Na & Kitayama, 2011). Perhaps one of the clearest examples of this dichotomy exists in Western academic traditions, which continue to be subject to European notions of separateness that have produced what Gusa (2010) describes as an
Is spelling and grammar always reliable? Spell check and grammar isn’t always reliable. When you make a spelling mistake in spelling and grammar you look for the correction straight away and you don’t learn how to spell it. You can also spell the word the correct way, however a different meaning. For example that piece of work was Wright, it should be that work was right, and spelling and grammar does not identify that mistake.
My texts both discuss grammar, but they are different because they have conflicting opinions on their definition of proper grammar. These definitions of the role that grammatical roles play in good writing differ because the rhetors of each text are targeting different audiences with different exigences. Audience The audiences that are targeted in these two texts are very different; the article “Why you need good grammar” by Michael Kwan is targeted towards a more traditional and conservative audience because throughout the text he emphasizes that proper grammar is necessary in all situations, and shows his repugnance to modern day bloggers and internet users for not using correct grammar on the web. Kwan also writes that he thinks that all the new ways of communicating and sharing your opinion through the web and other new technology is ruining grammar, and stresses that we should go back to traditional proper grammar. The cartoon in the Wall Street Journal is targeted towards a younger, open-minded, and more liberal audience as it shows a picture of modern day rock and roll
We did meet with Suzanne Christopher and discussed with her the characteristics of ASL that make it “non-English.” Ms. Christopher provided us with current research concerning ASL’s linguistic identity. After analyzing this research, we concluded that ASL has its own distinct grammar, morphology, modality, structure, syntax, markers, and idioms. It therefore meets the criterion by which CSU defines a language as foreign. (Not all sign languages meet the criterion, though ASL clearly does. For example, Signed Exact English cannot be considered a “non-English” language; it assigns a unique sign to each English word and uses standard English grammar and syntax.)
Nicole Brouwer 2nd hour Honors English Don’t Judge a Book by its Cover “The discovery of truth is prevented more effectively, not by the false appearance things present and which mislead into error, not directly by weakness of the reasoning powers, but by preconceived opinion, by prejudice.” -Arthur Schopenhauer Stereotyping, superstitions, and being prejudice are all components that lead to misjudging others. Many myths have been associated with different ethnic groups, and it leads to ethnic segregation. An understanding about other cultures may help decrease the negativity and overcomes prejudice. What does being prejudice mean? Why do societies leap at the chance to judge others?
Bonsanti appears to be driven by basic humanity and a belief in general equality. While McDaniel’s response to the question is very specific and personally driven; he makes no reference to the basic counter argument or hardcore fact. After reading some of these authors’ other responses to other extremely controversial topics; I was able to see a pattern in their workings which support my conclusions. These authors have very different perceptions which are why I chose their articles. Bonsanti’s perception is very clear and genuinely supported by those who share a common ground.