These two stores were in high-crime-rate areas. Company Q should consider, instead of simply cutting losses and closing, creating a more crime-free place for the community and for the stores employees. Not only does closing stores create a higher unemployment percentage in an already high-crime area, but it also takes the profits that should go to the area to neighboring parts. Maybe by tightening up security devices such as cameras and alarms, etc, Company Q could work toward bettering the community and its profits. Besides, if chains closed every time they lost money, there would be a huge loss in just the opening and reopening phases of a business.
It is obvious that PSS is facing a hard dilemma in adaption to change. PSS could choose to drop its total mission and depend on FSS, the HUD’s new project, to offer the poor families the social welfare, but it is an irresponsible method. So HASCO needs to continue its mission. PSS has successfully helped for hundred motivated families from public assistance and provide universal access to all welfare families rather than just those the program operates define as motivated. i Facing the new policy, as the Director of HASCO, Holt needs to make sure his objectives.
Once this idea is established more people will feel safer walking to school, work and etc. Especially since the killing rate in Cleveland is off the chart. Something has to be done about it. We need more committed families who lost someone close due to violence. Then more people will want to hear of a way to rid our city from it.
The issue here is how to get the homeless people in-touch with those that can help them the most, this tends to lend itself to another drawback. The current system of social services in the United States is designed for people to come to them or make a phone call, ultimately those that may need it the most, the homeless traditionally will not have access to a phone or the bus to be able to get to a government entity. A plan will need to be devised as we move along with going directly out into the streets to ask the homeless directly if they need help and services, and to explain what may be available to them to help. Another possible solution is to set up kiosks in the most well-known homeless areas, this will alleviate some financial burden of trying to go person to person, and still try to be able to reach as many people as possible about helpful programs that are available to
More importantly, it hurts the lives of the many people that were working for Hostess. They can't make a living without a job, without a job they wouldn't have the money to pay for their bills or even their house and might even add to the growing population of homeless people. It would also hurt the states in which the bakeries or plants were shut down. Also, the liquidation affects the people who love Hostess, people who grew up with Hostess, and the new-coming babies that won't be able to enjoy any of their products anymore. The Union is supposed to help the economy, not take away businesses that will help it.
She came up with a bare bones resume and got started. By the end of the book she realized how horribly hard and degrading it is to be a part of the working poor. She believes the government should give more assistance to the “working poor” and others should rally behind getting them better pay. The author is persuading the reader to feel sorry for the people she writes about and to understand their hardships. She seems to have succeeded, but I’m not sure creating more taxes for other families by issuing more government help to these people is the way to do it.
So, while politicians talk about the “desperate prison crisis”, we should think about where the actual desperation really lies. The problem is that we need to stop incarcerating vast amounts of non-violent offenders for 25 years to life. Non-violent criminals with minor offenses should not be dictated under the three-strike law. Even with this simple change in the three-strike law, our society would save more money funding other alternatives such as prime prevention strategies. These strategies include programs designed to reduce repeat victimization in domestic burglary, theft, and any other violence.
If once position is against giving panhandlers money, donating money to legitimate organizations is a must. Many of these organizations fully dedicate themselves to fighting homelessness. Volunteering some time to organizations and service agencies addressing this issue is another possible venture. When donating money to an organization, make sure that 100 percent of donations help towards getting people off the street into a safe and manageable manner, and often times gets them the proper treatment they need (drug or alcohol addiction). Panhandling is a contentious matter that will most likely never be fully resolved, but being well educated and determined on the subject will help solve the
We are seeing all this monetary loss, which could in the use of helping the poor to make our society into a better place for the future, so we can abolish the poverty and crime that people go through on a daily basis. He also states how the police are tracking down drugs, which is a good thing, but he does not want the police to grab a hold of him because he’s the only doing what is necessary so that he can survive in this deprived community. Rather, Shakur advocates a “war on poverty” which he implies would also take away the need for many blacks to deal drugs. He also states that since he is black, he has to make a living by doing what ever is necessary to survive. In this case it might even include selling drugs, even if he does not want to.
We can solve these problem by providing those homeless people with a small with a small room as the government can’t afford to build big house just to save those homeless people . Besides that , the government can offer