Hollitz Chapter 9 Questions

720 Words3 Pages
Abby Hess Dr. Chalberg Due: 11/7/12 Hollitz, Chapter 9, Question 5 Garrison and Douglas reflect the division between other abolitionists willing to compromise for small gains and those unwilling to compromise on anything. There are many pros and cons of each position in terms of achieving the end goal of abolition. Garrison represents all abolitionists who were not willing to compromise for anything; he burned a copy of the Fugitive State law, along with other documents that were in favor of slavery, and shouted “so perish all compromises with tyranny” [Hollitz, p. 144]. He also proposed that America have “no union with the slaveholders”, and said that it was “impossible for tyrants and enemies of tyranny to coalesce and legislate together for the preservation of human rights, or the promotion of the interests of Liberty” [Source 4]. He also said that “[America] should be occupied by all those who do not mean to compromise the principles of justice and liberty” [Source 4]. Clearly, he did not compromise his beliefs at all, for anything, and this proved him to be very passionate about his cause. However, in the beginning not many people really cared about what Garrison had to say. He was so extreme in his writings and speeches that it took time for more people to become interested. Also, as interested as Garrison was in freedom for black slaves, he was not convinced that they should be treated the way whites were treated. He was not fighting for equality, just freedom from slavery. This would make some people – especially Douglas – question how loyal he really was to the black population. Douglas represents everyone who was willing to compromise for small gains on the road to abolition; he was half black, and was raised by a slave. Douglas knew what it was like to be a black slave in early America, and believed that all black people should have freedom,
Open Document