Memories are a way of recalling ones personal experiences. Whether a positive or negative nature they form who we are as individuals. History is the recorded experiences and events which have occurred in the past. There is a strong entwinement between history and memory and this allows the inconsistencies of personal memories to influence the credibility of human history. This is reflected in Denise Levertov’s poems’ ‘Ways of conquest’ and ‘In Thai Bin (peace) Province’.
It is an umbrella term, associated with many types of disciplines outside the historical realm, and can be segregated into an explanation of national identity or the archival support in the background. On top of this, all of the authors agree that memory and history are interdependent. They are able to question and enhance each other because of the opposite natures. As such, it can be guaranteed that historians of this generation are subject to the subjectivity of the memory-history relationship. Absolute truth to what happened in the past is impossible to find, but we may be able to piece together perspectives to create a story of the historical past.
Analyse the ways history and memory generate compelling and unexpected insights. In your response, make detailed reference to your prescribed text and at least ONE other related text of your own choosing. History and memory are both multifaceted ideas that are challenged continually. History is often perceived as fact, in the recount of an event or retelling of a story that did in fact, take place. Through study however, it becomes clear that history is a consequence of memory, which makes it unreliable and changed by circumstance.
Percent yield of CuO is clearly and correctly reported. Calculations are complete, but units and/or s.f. incorrect, minor error, descriptions are not clear. Descriptions of the calculations are missing; multiple minor errors in calculations. Major errors; difficult to follow; descriptions of calculations are not included.
That is, a false premise can possibly lead to a false result, and inconclusive premises will also yield an inconclusive conclusion. Both types of reasoning are routinely employed. One difference between them is that in deductive reasoning, the evidence provided must be a set about which everything is known before the conclusion can be drawn. Since it is difficult to know everything before drawing a conclusion, deductive reasoning has little use in the real world. This is where inductive reasoning steps in.
The development, the interpretation and scoring of the assessment are meaningful and clearly explained. However there are several technical weaknesses: 1) there is no content-related validity evidence, 2) the norms are estimated from inadequate and biased samples, and 3) the reliability and validity studies that report and interpret the results beyond the scope of the limited samples that
English Advanced HSC “UNDERSTANDING NOURISHES BELONGING... A LACK OF UNDERSTANDING PREVENTS IT.” Demonstrate how your prescribed text and ONE other related text of your own choosing represent this interpretation of belonging. It is often in the nature of mankind to be hardwired to develop a sense of connection with one another, and this desire to connect can be described as the need to belong. Belonging refers to the state when one reaches a likeness or similarity – physical, emotional or otherwise, to another unit, for instance a community, place or ideal. However this likeness that is wished to be reached can only be thoroughly done so and encouraged if said person is completely aware of his or her surroundings and can understand the
Bartov's argument is less-evident and less-clear. Finally, Glass' article is presented as a persuasive or argumentative one, his arguments are backed up by facts and convincing primary sources from both sides of the argument. Whereas
No References section. Uses documentation, but frequent formatting/citation errors are present; some sources have questionable credibility. Reference section is not correctly cited. Sources used are credible and documented appropriately to the discipline; formatting and citation is usually correct, but some lack of control is apparent. Reference section is correctly cited.
While there are always some exceptions, an award tends to represent one's significance and contributions rather than create new challenges. Some may say that this achievement is double-handed in the sense it creates a need for responsibility, but I believe it is responsibility in the good sense: responsibility of setting a standard for people seeking to be in one's footsteps. In conclusion, there are so many different types of personal achievement that it is almost impossible to describe a true representation of its challenge producing notion. Globally political achievements are more usually the ones that produce an enduring challenge, simply because the world is never consistent. It teems with differing ideas from political