History Teacher and Barred Owl Ap English Essay

625 Words3 Pages
In the poems “A Barred Owl” and “The History Teacher”, the speakers are attempting to mitigate the evils of the world. Wilbur’s short poem is much less extreme than Collins’s when doing this. Wilbur uses a simple explanation while Collins continues to make up more and more absurd stories. The intention is the same, but the way the speakers go about it is very different. The speaker in Wilbur’s poem is merely a parent trying to settle a restless child, while the speaker in Collins’s poem is a teacher trying to shield his students from the many evils of the world. Children must be protected and soothed, and adults always make their best effort to achieve this. Contradicting images and diction are presented in both poems. In A Barred Owl, the author provides frightening images with words like “darkened” and “terrors” and with the lines “Or dreaming of some small thing in a claw Borne up to some dark branch and eaten raw.” Wilbur presents these gruesome images but manages to downplay them with a simple explanation to the child. Even though these images and diction are scary, the poem still manages to be more settling than Collins’s poem. Collins is softer with his images, but the poem is more unsettling. “… the Enola Gay dropped one tiny atom on Japan.” The image of this is much softer, but it feels more sinister. The teacher has just managed to make a horrific event seem like something very harmless. This “harmless” lie is in fact hindering the students. Their minds and innocence may be satisfied, but their practical view of the world is compromised. Both of these poems attempt to help the children maintain their innocence. Wilbur manages to make the large, scary owl seem simplistic and less frightening when the child is told that calls of the owl are merely asking “Who cooks for you?” The child is placated with a soothing explanation for the hooting that

More about History Teacher and Barred Owl Ap English Essay

Open Document