Heraclitus and Ethical Philosophy

710 Words3 Pages
Heraclitus and Ethical Philosophy Heraclitus is known for his writings and his views on metaphysics. This is what he is mainly looked when people think about his philosophy but he is also very interesting in his talk on the human nature. Because of this he seems to be among the first philosophers to get into the topic of ethics. The definition of ethics is defined by the moral principles that govern a person's or group's behavior. Heraclitus does this time and time again through his writings in the “Presocratics Reader”. Such as when he clearly refers to human nature in (B78, pg. 45, #42) where he claims that “human nature has no insight, but divine nature has it.” Among all the known famous ethical philosophers Heraclitus is among the older of the known. It would only make sense that he be the first of the known philosophers to get into ethics. Plato and Aristotle are among the most known of all ethical philosophers or even philosophers in general. Plato, however, wasn’t around until roughly 428-348 B.C. and Aristotle not until 384-322 B.C. Heraclitus was around at least close to 50 years before Plato around 500 B.C., so that would prove that Heraclitus is the first philosopher to bring ethics into his writing. Among much of the insults that Heraclitus puts out, he says things about humans that do not think or are foolish. He states that “a fool is excited by every word” (B87, pg. 44, #31) and “dogs bark at everyone they do not know” (B97, pg. 32, #32). This is very interesting because he seems to be saying that people who don’t think and know are easy to manipulate and trick. Also, he compares us to dogs and how they get excited by everyone including those they do not know. Does this make him a misanthrope or is he truly thinking about how humans tend to act, thus making ethical claims. He speaks a lot of human nature and how humans act in the world. For
Open Document