Identify the main reasons for reviewing working methods, products and / or services in a business environment. The main reason why a business should review working methods, products and / or services are to ensure that they are keeping in line with other businesses. An example of not keeping up with the times is HMV. Change can cause added pressures to the business. However there are changes that would have a small affect on the business.
This will save time in the long run, which should encourage most employees despite their initial frustration with the management system change. A series of training and preparation with individualized tutorials might mitigate some anticipated resistance. Inadequate communication may also cause resistance. Management will make the major decisions with regard to the scheduled change; it is their obligation to clarify these decisions to subordinates within the company. Management is also expected to properly handle the inevitable questions and grievances; it is important to avoid misinterpretation regarding the procedural
When problems are not dealt with they can become conflicts against the company that can take long times to settle since they employee most likely found someone who would listen to them. This can be an outside person who then can bring law suits or worse. This is not good for the company so these problems should be handled quickly and in the right ways when they
If the product is of low value, then the quality expectation isn't so great. It's important not to over-promise the customer and give them false expectations. Having a balance of quality, time, and cost will ensure that the customer has a good buying result. Customers expect a product to be of particular quality, value, and time turnaround in respect to the price paid. They also expect a professional level of service.
Joe could lose his job and even worse he could put the company in place for a lawsuit. The ethical theory that supports how I think Joe should respond to this invitation is the utilitarianism theory. This approach states that a decision that maximizes the ratio of good over evil for all those concerned is the ethical course, (McAdams, Neslund, & Neslund, 2007). The utilitarianism theory should be used because Joe should think which action he should take that would benefit the most involved. If he goes on the trip it is only good for Bill.
o A tendency to avoid reversing changes even if it was not the best choice o In reality, past expenditures are sunk costs and the organization should use a clean slate to look at new choices, but to the manager, this will come at great personal loss. • This relates to strategy because it is important to understand the effect management has on it. o If a manager will suffer personal embarrassment or a loss by adopting a new (although better) strategy, they are more likely to simply stick with the current course of action. o This can be avoided by assessing and addressing the problems of an organization prior to major investments being made o Implication on strategic choice, as they can act for the betterment or detriment of the organization. o Differences in manager’s preferences are specific to their individual personalities, experiences and situations.
The apprehension of the management team is understood because that is the culture; however, once the functionality is implemented and the management team sees the growth and positive change, the company will be more adapt to change. The project management consultant’s strategies to convince the Levon management team to accept and move forward with the change required realistic information to be presented, as well as for the team to be shown where they can
If no proof is provided, under the minority view of The Specific Intent Test, it could be concluded that the company did not want the employee or any other employee to quit, but to abide by the new policy in order to keep up with the demand of the company’s growth. If the company’s working conditions are found by the court to be reasonable, the claim will fall short under both tests. With regards to the current claim against the company, the change in the work schedule policy affects all production employees. It was not the intent of the company to make the change to cause working conditions to be so unbearable that an employee would quit, therefore it is not constructive discharge. For the protected class of Religion, Title VII states that covered employers shall not treat employees differently based on religion, harass employees based on religion, deny reasonable accommodation requests, or retaliate against employees (EEOC, 2012).
are ways to give the consumer a choice on how they want their shopping experience to go. With all the people that embrace these new technologies, there are many who would rather do business the old fashioned way, without all the bells and whistles. For this reason, companies need to accommodate all types of consumers and be sure that the technologies do not overwhelm the product. Inventory control is another important role for technology to have a place in retail management. Software that can help stores understand why they seller don't sell are important to keep costs low throughout the company.
If these assumptions are unchecked or inappropriate, we will make poor decisions and wrong judgments. In our personal relationships we use critical thinking to keep our lines of communications open thereby allowing us to use lessons learned to avoid repeating the same mistakes. In the workplace we avoid stagnation and are willing to challenge the current thinking, which may be out of date and is no longer relevant to our current work philosophy. Paul Richard (2008), an authority on critical thinking, characterizes a good critical thinker in terms of knowledge, abilities, attitudes, and habitual ways of behaving, including the following characteristics. The critical thinker: • uses evidence skillfully and impartially • organizes thoughts and articulates them concisely and coherently • distinguishes between logically valid and invalid inferences • suspends judgment in the absence of sufficient evidence to support a decision • understands the difference between reasoning and rationalizing • attempts to anticipate the probable consequences of alternative actions • understands the idea of degrees of belief • sees similarities and analogies that are not superficially