Creating a predictable, consistent, and success-oriented environment will promote self-management in my students by creating, basic, daily routines with limited changes (Savage & Savage, 2010). These predictable and consistent routines will drive a success-orientated environment by reducing student anxiety creating a positive self-efficacy within each student (Savage & Savage, 2010). With my endorsement in Special Education the ability to create and keep basic routines will be directed by the physical, emotional, and
Lack of teamwork can allow room for error to occur. In leadership roles it's important to show appreciation for the staff by giving incentives for all their hard work this is sometimes overlooked. Finding solutions to conflicts that might occur giving the necessary education in order to improve one's job rather having a high turnover rate. Baack, D. E. & Fischer, A. (2013).
Pupil Teachers had smaller classes which enabled them to teach better. As a result of the high quality of teaching, pupil teachers gained more respect by both other teachers and pupils. The revised code, which is also known as 'Payment by Results' was set up by a man called Robert Lowe in 1862 as a result of the Newcastle Commission which was formed in 1861 which was designed to save the government money but spot the holes in education. The revised code encouraged schools to produce better grades. This meant that the teachers focused on all the students not just the able students.
I mean, sure, grades are very motivational, but they are also very harming. Countless suicides are caused by grades and pressure, and I think it just really isn’t necessary to put a student on the spot like that. Let’s say a student makes straight A’s. That’s great in most cases, but does it really self-motivate the student into learning more, or does it give them a little lee-way to slack off and maybe not study as much? Or let’s say that a student gets straight C’s.
This doesn’t always mean that this pupil is the smartest and cleverest out of everyone in the class it just mean that they are perceived as a ‘ideal pupil’ because of their behaviour, attitudes towards their work and others, uniform, behaviour towards the teacher and how neat their work/books are etc. If a pupil has a messy book, messy uniform and talks to the people around them whilst in the classroom, the teacher will more than likely not view this pupil as an ‘ideal pupil’ but just because they have a messy uniform and messy writing, it doesn’t always mean that they are not clever. Also, if a pupil’s behaviour is not up to the teacher’s expectations it could quite often mean that they will be sent outside of the classroom, when they are sent outside of the classroom, they are missing valuable information and learning time because they are spending time what they should be using to learn
There are some major problems with using them. Students with high I.Q’s are expected to do better than the rest of their class, and on the flip side students with low I.Q.’s are expected to do worse. That is not always fair because students with low I.Q.’s might not get the attention needed simply because their teachers do not expect much from them. In the end there is no fairness to some. This leads to an ethical question of, is giving an intelligence test ethical?
This therefore means that since their distraction and hyperactivity levels are suppressed, they can function well and execute tasks as well as the average non-ADHD student. However, when non-ADHD students pervade the system, the state of equality is compromised. This provides non-ADHD Adderall consumers a continued advantage over the ADHD students. These essentially still have a better shot at thriving better and outperforming the ADHD. This deliberate use of Adderall to gain better grades puts ADHD students at a further disadvantage because there is no other means by which the field could be leveled once more.
I believe that while Singer develops his argument by claiming that while people in rich states can survive without luxuries; those in poorer ones where most are manufactured could not survive, as their economic base would fall apart. With some adjustment of his analogy to make it a more accurate representation of the global economy, Singer would find his argument overcoming its central inherent weakness. In my own opinion I believe, Singer’s view of our obligation to help relieve the suffering of people in distant nations are mostly right because, if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought, morally, to do
Welsh says the reasoning behind the emigrated student’s success is the self determination and motivation to do well in school, as well as hard work exerted by the students. I agree with Welsh’s argument and believe that students who emigrated from foreign countries to the United States see their learning opportunity as a privilege that they do not take for granted unlike most of us. The American student s who are born with the opportunity to learn in United States schools tend to take their education for granted. They see it more as a requirement rather than opportunity. Welsh’s article discusses the difference between American students and Asian students.
When someone has learning orientation, building competence is deemed more important than demonstrating competence. Someone that shows high levels of learning orientation is more likely to choose an extremely difficult class because these types of people enjoy working on new things, and even if they fail, they see it as a learning experience and gain knowledge from that failure. Research has showed that a learning goal orientation improves self-confidence, as well as many other things. The other dimension was performance-prove. On this section I scored an 18, which was also considered above average.