C).” I think this is unjust because you shouldn’t be drowned for wanting to hang out with another man. Examples of injustice can next be found in the area of property law. Hammurabi states “If a man has broken through a wall to rob a house, they shall pierce him or hang him in the hole he has made (Doc D).” I believe this is unjust, because what if the owners of that house don’t want him hanging and rotting in there wall? That is extremely cruel to do that!!! Examples of injustice finally be found in the area of personal injury law.
I think that the idea that he does not deserve his reputation is solely for argument, because some people love the feeling of making other people angry. So Alexander made some mistakes and maybe he killed people, just because he had the authority, but no one is perfect and you can’t argue that he does not deserve this title because he made these mistakes. Every human person has made mistakes because no one human has any faults in their history. If you look at other great leaders, they all had a weakness and eventually led to their downfall, but just because they had weaknesses does not mean that they should not be honored for their accomplishments. I think that ‘defaming’ Alexander the Great does not prove the ‘no’ side in any way, because he did many things to help his empire and even though he was the cause of many deaths to the native people of their homelands, he did what he thought was best for his people.
Persuasive essay Would you not do whatever it takes just to know that there is one less murderer on our planet? Give justice to the vistim’s grieving family at any cost? Many people believe that capital punishmant is unethical and should be abolished. But presently, the crime rate is rapidly increasing due to the lack of effective capital punishment. The murderers deserve to be executed like they killed their victims.
Terror Tactics and Appeasement Bradley Christoffersen Stalin’s terror tactics used against his own people are to show them if you doubt your country it will not get any better. To punish the ones who criticize and doubt the county makes others doubt and think of the flaws and don’t work on how to make it better but just civil outrage. Sending people who preach these negative ideas is to make sure others don’t get the idea’s and make sure that those traitors pay for their reason and be sent to the Gulag. Without military enforcement and public knowledge of their capability’s is to know what happens when you aren’t following the rules and positive out reach you are supposed to strive for in making the country a better place. It wasn’t just
This explains why not all guards behaved in such a manner. Wanting revenge is an important factor, as these prisoners had killed fellow US soldiers who may have been close friends to the guards. Guards may have felt that the humiliation that the prisoners were subjected to was a more suitable punishment for their behaviour, and would ‘teach them a lesson’. Deindividuation and helplessness of the situation also have to be taken into account, as anyone put in the conditions and stress that soldiers are under may behave differently, not forgetting their job requires dehumanisation to enable them to be able to carry out orders they are given. This theory was based upon mainly male subjects and therefore it cannot be assumed that findings can be applied to the whole population, as there are obvious differences between male and female behaviours when considering aggression.
To begin with, Wargrave tries to bring justice to innocent victims, but ends up breaking the law in the process. He chooses to kill the guilty who cannot be touched by the law in order to avenge the lives that were lost due to those people. Justice Wargrave has no right to choose the punishments of individuals at fault, no matter how horrible the crime one has committed. But, he
Secondly, it is true that death penalty is irreversible, but it is hard to kill a wrongly convicted person due to the several chances given to the convicted to prove his innocence with the appellate systems in place with the existing justice system, otherwise why does every country in the world have one? Thirdly, death penalty assures safety of the society by eliminating these criminals, thus eliminating repeat offenders. Deterrence means to punish somebody as an example and to create fear in other people for the punishment. The death penalty is one of those
Defending Innocents I believe animal testing is one of the most cruel things a person can do to a living thing. It is not acceptable to subject these innocent animals under terrible scrutiny. According to PETA: “More than 100 million animals are tortured and killed each year in scientific experiments”. “Some people say animal testing and experimentation should go on because there is nothing wrong with it if it’s ethically correct, these people are contradicting themselves because they are rejecting the same experiments but practiced on human beings” (PETA). They are agreeing that these experiments are inflicting terrible pain to animals that humans could never undergo.
These punishments which are defined by Hammurabi were very strict. For instance ‘If a man has accused a man and has charged him with manslaughter and then has not proved [it against] him, his accuser shall be put to death.’ and ‘If a man has committed robbery and is caught, that man shall be put to death.’ In my point of view this is wrong approach to criminal. Because a man who kill someone and other man who stole something are not the same. However according to Hammurabi’s Law they are punished the same technique. Secondly, Hammurabi’s Law Code draw attention to inequalities in the society.
As far as I know or heard, I haven’t heard any drastic measures going that deep to humans eating their species, but you get my point humans are cruel and share common attributes and act like animals in many ways. Human beings are cruel to each other because they are urged by their instincts to act that way. They hurt others emotionally and physically to express their feelings or expressions towards that person. Cruel to other human beings is something that comes to us quite naturally. I feel that most attackers or victimizers would say they have to do that bad deed in order