It seems strange that people in our time now, who dress and act in a contemporary fashion, would speak in such a way. It makes the movie very unbelievable. Therefore, Zeffirelli’s version of Romeo and Juliet is more authentic and convincing than Luhrmann’s version because of Zeffirelli’s use of costume and prop, set design and overall light atmosphere. To begin with, the first thing Zeffirelli did better than Luhrmann was the settings he created in the scene because he has old, worn out and historic places that fit
The Comparisons and the Contrasts of The Crucible Thesis: Arthur Miller uses both similarities and differences in both the film and the play, The Crucible. In my opinion the play is the better out of the two. I. The play and the film of The Crucible A. Similarities between the film and the play.
This statement could explain why there are so many new adaptations of Shakespeares plays, and why they change so much from the original Roman Polanskis version (171) of the play doesnt change too much as it is for a cinema audience, and the people viewing it would have payed and would have been expecting a more conventional, unchanged Macbeth because they made a deliberate choice to view it. On the other hand people watching Macbeth on the Estate may not have wanted, or intended to see a Shakespeare film and may not normally opt to watch Shakespeare. Both versions are made with this in mind, and adapt the play accordingly. The Polanski version opens with a long establishing shot, giving the viewer an idea of the settings. It is set on a beach, which is deserted and lifeless.
Many classic Shakespeare plays have been turned into films over the years. Some of the film adaptations are very close to the original story, but some stray away from the original play it is based on. Doing a modern version of one of Shakespeare’s works is tough because the language that Shakespeare uses is very important to the plays. In fact, if you did not know that the movie was based on a play, you may not even know. I think that this is the case for many when it comes to Shes the Man, which is based loosely on Twelfth Night by William Shakespeare.
It is rare to find perfect harmony in both. Usually, I try to read the book before I see the movie because I find it disappoints me in the reverse. Fully capturing the essence of a novel on film can be very challenging. Novels, in general, offer more background and insight and allow more time for character development. The best way to decide if the mediums are closely related is to do a side by side comparison and see if the movie can hold the same value.
What interests you most? I find it thought-stimulating to ponder the content of the written play itself and its shortened movie version. Does an adequate shortened movie means that certain parts of the written play was unnecessary or not important enough? This leads to the discussion of whether the written play or the movie gives the most authentic and accurate portrayal of the Laramie incident. What strikes you most?
Hamlet on Film Compare and Contrast Hamlet by Williams Shakespeare is expressed and portrayed in multiple versions and with different interpretations. They each take place in different setting and time periods. The Kenneth Branagh version, directed in 1996, takes place in the medieval era. Now the Micheal Almereyda version, directed in 2000, was more modern and edited. I prefer the Branagh version over the Almereyda version because it’s more depictive and more relevant to the play than the Almereyda version that lost the true value of Hamlet.
English 67 Comparison Sample Essay I Give It An “A” Many people argue that the book is always better than the movie. They will tell you that the written page offers something that the cinematic one can't, that a movie always leaves out details that the book contains, and that key elements of the original story are often missing in the film version. And these book lovers are often right. But in the case of Nathaniel Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter and Will Gluck's Easy A (which is loosely based on Hawthorne's novel), the latter speaks to the modern audience in ways the original never saw coming. Yet, they share two very similar heroines, and offer messages about what it's like to be an outcast.
The complex character of Hamlet has been carefully sculpted by means of contrast from the very beginning of the play. This interesting means of character development exposes the similarities and differences between the minor characters Fortinbras, and Laertes, and that of the protagonist, Hamlet. These overlaps are shown through complimentary mental traits, the drive to achieve common goals, distinctions of morality and the tendency of characters to act on first intentions. It is through the comparison of these elements and character traits in the minor characters contrasted to those of Hamlet that Shakespeare highlights the tragic flaw in his persona. From the very first act in the play, the character of Hamlet is contrasted directly to Fortinbras of Norway.
Luhrmann’s film, then again, could on the verge of excessively boisterous and unsavoury at the same time, but in any case it kept me awake. I have to say, neither of these films are the complete adaptation of The Great Gatsby. The novel is the overall the best genre for the audience, the descriptive techniques used by F. Scott Fitzgerald, make the novel the great art that it is, with the novel written like that it gives the audience the opportunity to imagine the novel how they