Hamlet Compare/Contrast Essay

921 Words4 Pages
A piece of literature is a form of artwork, and as such the viewer is free to comprehend and express such a piece however one sees fit. Shakespeare’s Hamlet was completed and performed beginning in the 1600’s, set in the late middle ages in and around the royal palace in Elsinore, Denmark. To this day Hamlet is still read and discussed for it is a great literary piece. As it has been performed for decades, as technology advanced, so did performances, especially soliloquies--which began to be filmed and interpreted with individual ideas. The most known performances of Hamlet’s “To be or not to be”(III.I.58-90) soliloquy are done by actors Kenneth Branaugh, David Tennant, and Lawrence Olivier. Each actor’s performance differs in both character, setting, tone, and manner. Kenneth Branaugh’s performance of Hamlet’s soliloquy, done in 1996, was quite different from the aforementioned actors. Different in almost every way. First of all, his range of emotions and the tone of his monologue is the polar opposite of both Tennant’s and Olivier’s version. Branaugh performs Hamlet’s soliloquy in a setting that is full of moderately bright, warm light--giving this scene a feeling of just that. In his version he performs the majority of his speech to a large mirror, Branaugh looks into the mirror holding his dagger talking to a reflection of himself. The deeper meaning in this action is that the actor interpreted this scene as Hamlet talking not only aloud, but talking and reasoning with himself, in this case an actual reflection of himself. This is done to portray a dialogue between Hamlet and his conscience, coming to terms with a decision he must make. This portrayal of Hamlet is particularly different because Branaugh speaks and behaves with a manner of confidence and possible power--the decision on how to act out his revenge being a contributing factor to this
Open Document