For example , if a team member is assigned resources, then it is clear to others that the job is meant for that team member-due to the job specification and specialization. Everyone understands both team and individual performance goals and knows what is expected. 2. Team also needs clear objectives and goals: If the team does not have clear objectives then the purpose of forming a team is defeated. Increasingly the emphasis is on measuring the teams performance from what the team does to what the team is achieving.
I believe that anyone who is in a leadership role should understand that they will be scrutinized more closely than those who are not. Because of this, I believe that a leader should be more cautious and reserved in their public and personal lives. Yes, they are human, but they are setting an example for others to follow. If a person cannot demonstrate self-control on a personal level, how are we to trust that they will exercise self-control on a professional level? What does this do to the trust that has been built between leaders and followers?
Tuckman’s theory helps individuals to understand how team progress evolves. It helps team members within the public services to consider how they encounter different problems at different stages of their development. This then leads to team cohesion because the group comes together during the team tasks. A limitation within this theory may be that it makes team building too linear and consecutive, however this is a useful tool within many public services like the police force, royal navy and fire service, due to it being important to provide the precise services needed as a team. However it is important to understand that not all teams evolve smoothly.
Explain the difference in the influence of managers and leaders on their teams. This would be based very heavily on a person’s leadership style and this is usually gauged through their levels of empathy and how they manage and lead their individual teams see below chart of management styles. Each style would affect the team in different ways and would play to their strengths but may also not be effective for all members of a team this is why it become important to skill mix teams and allow for all areas of experience to be given an opportunity to work together. 2.2. Evaluate the suitability and impact of different leadership styles in different contexts.
The first step of effective leadership is to recognize the various needs and concerns of the clique and the social network on the job. In the simulation, the manager realizes that it is not so a desirable circumstances of being responsible for the teams that have clearly resisted the leadership. The manager had to resize and restructure the team for the best intentions of the team to understanding the formation and fundamental sub-structures, and their impact on supporting the group thinking towards organizational goals. The success of the leadership was reliant on the leadership style and decisions that utilize the influence of the teams’ behavior and the kind of teams that was chosen to execute those decisions. It is not always likely to sustain a fixed leadership style to deal with change interrelated
This paper will explain the difference between leadership and management, explain characteristics of an effective leader, and last illustrate views of leadership. The term leadership and management are assuming to be the same. However, there are noticeable differences between the two. Leaders guide their employees to success and maintain an open communication within their unit. Leaders seem to instill a sense of significance in the workforce by giving employees the power of their vision and values (Kilbort, 2004).
The way you tell someone to do something, may be ok to one person, but it could be offensive, or threatening to another. When you offend that person, it is then when you have to be the bigger person and fix things. If not, the work place will not be very comfortable to work in for the both of you and it could effect the people around you, too. Another example in this area would be how you spend your time. Time management is very important in all aspects of life.
What style of leadership did the leader exhibit? What problem-solving steps were taken to resolve the situation? What steps would have produced better results? • Explain whether the team or group was effective. Support your position by discussing goals, roles, ground rules, norms, and characteristics your team or group displayed.
If one is use to working a certain way, then it would be difficult for an individual to work in a group. The individual will most likely want to take over the group as I noticed that is what Fester was basically doing. Fester wanted to be in control and this is
Advantages of a Collaborative Writing Process A work-together opportunity creates better results and products because of sharing ideas and that decision making is based on the final agreement of several “heads” instead of one. Each team member offers his particular skills and talents to the group. Collaboration would benefit from focusing on using the most useful skills for writing a document. Collaborative writing itself is a communication process which emphasizes members’ interaction thus offering chances for respecting each other in a business and increasing productivity (VanAlstyne, 2005) Disadvantages of a Collaborative Writing Process Some disadvantages involved in a collaborative team are workload disparity, conflict situations, and cultural differences. It is required that every member of the team to show the same commitment to the job, as well as agree to work avoiding the appearance of anger and antipathy.