Google Street View In Germany

500 Words2 Pages
Question 1 Part A According to this chapter, Google Street View is not totally well-received in Germany. It mentioned about the politician and regulator like (The Germany’s federal minister of food, agriculture, and consumer protection, Ilse Aigner) complaint and dissatisfied about the launch of Google Street View. Although there is only 3 % of the 8.5 million of German (around 244,000) submitted the form of consent, it implies not all the citizen are welcome to the act of Google and there is even a case in Austria a seventy-year-old vandalized the car with a garden pick. It is due to the traditional culture of German and some think Google is making money from them. Part B His argument can be referred to the page 29 the second paragraph. In the public debate, he mentioned the free-speech rights of everyone. When the government limits the use of Google Street View, It also prevents citizen from taking, sharing and even their freedom of speech. The public sphere belongs to the public and the street is a society’s asset and not belongs to the Government. That’s the reason why it is dangerous to rule the Google Street View as an infringement of free-speech and society’s assets. However, Google street view does not merely capture the image but also capture data from the Wi-Fi networks. If some is really reluctant to let others to view their home, to access to their information, Google Street View violates their privacy. Although Streets belong to society, houses are not. The house owner does have the choice. Part C It is true that the public sphere belongs to public. That’s why it is reasonable and acceptable for CCTV in public streets, in the MTR and the Google Street View service. However, it is not the same case in these 3 scenarios. For the first case, the purpose of installation for CCTV is for better management of property and video-taping the protest. Tough
Open Document