Geography in History: a Necessary Connection in Teaching Social Studies

482 Words2 Pages
Geography and history are complementary subjects best taught together within the social studies curriculum. It is part of the collected wisdom of teachers that one cannot teach history without geography or geography without history. Both subjects have been emphasized in high-profile curriculum reform reports produced by various organizations, such as the Bradley Commission on History in Schools, the Education for Democracy Project of the American Federation of Teachers, and the National Commission on Social Studies in the Schools. But most social studies teachers are primary teachers of history. They are ignoring an important part of history because they do not include geography as part of the teaching repertoire. The geographic perspective can enrich the study of history by helping students grasp the significance of location, the inevitability of change, and the importance of human perceptions at given times in the past. Helping students to become more informed geographically means teaching better history. Hypothesis How should classroom instructors proceed to connect geography with history in the curriculum. I believe that answering this question will involve three assumptions: It is impossible to understand the present without understanding geography. It is impossible to understand the present without understanding the past. It is impossible to understand the past without understanding geography. In other words, the rationale for history (studying the past to understand the present) requires knowing geography: today’s geography and the geography of different places at different times in the past. Synopsis of Research Bradley Commission-recognizes “the relationship between geography and history as a matrix of time and place, and as context for events”. Florida Commission on Social Studies Education published Connections,

More about Geography in History: a Necessary Connection in Teaching Social Studies

Open Document