The Military Conquests of Napoleon Bonaparte and His Rise to Power Napoleon’s eventual position as Emperor of France and conqueror of much of Europe was attainable by way of a trail of accolades escorted by luck. The accomplishments accredited to the proactive Napoleon himself were always ironically shadowed by a fall to destitution. The indubitable ambition, vehemence, and astuteness of Napoleon propelled him from a young age; he enclosed a self belief that he was preordained to be monumentally eminent. His military training and reflective inquisition of classic military and political heroes and ploys coalesced to mold a dominating and mystifying military leader as well as an illustrious political figure in the late eighteenth, into early nineteenth century of France. Born in Corsica, May 15th, 1769; Napoleon grew up with aspirations of a weighted and heroic distinction of himself engraved in the history books of his native land.
Every weapon classification that has been developed for military use is meant to serve a unique purpose in the complex tactical strategies that various modern infantry forces use around the globe. The development of the assault rifle and earlier types of small arms was influenced by significant historical origins. These historical origins range from the ancient discovery of gunpowder, to the arrival of modern warfare in the early twentieth century. The American M-16 and Russian AK-47 possess diverse backgrounds of military philosophy based on their designs and capabilities. The mass-production of these rival firearms and their modified variants during the Cold War era reflects the aspect that the United States and the USSR had established themselves as two dominant superpowers immediately following the post-war period in 1945.
Examples that support the relevance and influence of Parker’s principles during Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) are the rapid acquisition of the Mine Resistant, Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicle, the Army Force Generation (ARFORGEN) model and troop surges in both conflicts. During the early phases of the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, U.S Forces entered combat operations using Vietnam and Cold War era equipment that proved to be insufficient in the operational environment. To overcome these equipment shortfalls, our national industrial base used advanced technology and research to develop and manufacture new vehicles, uniforms, and weaponry to increase our combat effectiveness. For instance, when coalition forces experienced a significant increase in casualties and deaths as a result of Improvised Explosive Devices (IED), the Department of Defense (DOD) called upon America’s industrial base to develop and manufacture the MRAP. The reaction was overwhelming and resulted in
ROMMEL’S LEADERSHIP IN THE BATTLE OF EL ALAMEIN The nine principles of war provide general guidance for conducting war and military operations, The Principles are the enduring bedrock of Army doctrine. The nine principles of war are Mass, Objective, Offensive, Surprise, Economy of Force, Maneuver, Unity of Command, Security, and Simplicity (Army, 2008). Erwin Rommel was one of Germany’s most respected military leaders in World War Two and he played a part in two very significant battles during the war at El Alamein in North Africa and at D-Day. Rommel’s nickname was the ‘Desert Fox’ a title given to him by the British. During the battle of El Alamein, Rommel had Failures in six of the nine principles and successes in only three.
His greatest military achievement came in the Battle of the Bulge, where his tactical leadership and logistical genius helped him turn around his main forces to drive back the German’s final counter-offensive. General Patton successfully utilized mission command through understanding, visualizing, leading, and directing while commanding the biggest and bloodiest battle during World War II. To understand how General Patton utilized mission command to win the Battle of the Bulge, we must first understand the summary of events leading up to the Battle of the Bulge. World War II in Europe began in September 1939 and can be summarized into several main segments. The first being the German defeat of Polish and the surprisingly easy occupation of most of Western Europe.
WWII: The African and Mediterranean Theatres of War Essay The battle for North Africa was a struggle for control of the Suez Canal and access to oil from the Middle East and raw materials from Asia. Oil in particular had become a critical strategic commodity due to the increased mechanization of modern armies. Britain, which was the first major nation to field a completely mechanized army, was particularly dependent on the Middle Eastern oil. The Suez Canal also provided Britain with a valuable link to her overseas dominions–part of a lifeline that ran through the Mediterranean Sea. Thus, the North African campaign and the naval campaign for the Mediterranean were extensions of each other in a very real sense.
His first criminal insights developed in the 1860’s when he was working as a doctor in the army and the characteristics of the soldiers, however, his name came into Criminological significance with the publication of his first book, ‘The Criminal Man’ (1876). In this book he suggested from his research that criminals were biologically determined, a physical type with specific characteristics that differentiates them from others, and throwbacks to earlier forms of evolutionary life (Newburn 2007). During the period Lombroso wrote this book, Charles Darwin’s (1968) theory of evolution was a very popular concept, and Lombroso was thought to be heavily influenced by this, proposing that criminals were ‘lower down the evolutionary scale than law abiding citizens’ (Cited in Crowther 2007: 278). Before publishing ‘The Criminal Man’, Lombroso famously conducted a study on the physical and mental characteristics of 400 Italian soldiers and 90 ‘lunatics’, examining and comparing them. He concluded there were a selection of specific characteristics setting criminals apart from others and stated that they were a ‘sub-species’.
With evolvements of military technologies, military reform plays a major part in transforming the defence community of one’s nation. Force structures, organisation, equipment, budgets, doctrine, and strategy are parts of the mechanism of the transformation process that are well known in order to maximise the outcome of a reformed military. Ann Altman stated in her speech during the tenth annual Global Solutions Projects and Defence Exchange Conference, in Brussels last year that complexity is the main challenge in addressing the future outcomes of military technology due to the nature of the world as more irresolute, volatile and complex . This statement will be intertwined with the analogy of military reforms and this paper will show the important traits that support
“The Battle of Somme marked the beginning of modern warfare (Martin, Battle of Somme, Introduction Page).” Tanks came into action in the war grounds alongside armed battalions on their feet. They were made so that they could cope with the conditions
In 1917, the need for psychological testing arose when the United States entered into World War I. Psychologist Robert Yerkes and his committee of psychologists designed the Army Alpha and Beta tests that lay the groundwork for future standardized tests (Sass, 2005). The committee of psychologists led by Yerkes, included Thorndike, Thurstone, and Otis. The committee also included Lewis Terman, the developer of the Stanford-Binet IQ test. Their goal was to create a method could help the war efforts in areas of selection, categorization and assignment decisions for troops.