A plethora of different opinions on female orgasm had flourished prior to Lloyd, which essentially in time encouraged her to propose her perspective. She contended that the several theories proposed, actually lack sufficient evidence to validate any of the adaptive explanations for female orgasm. The motive behind her article was to provide a sufficient rebuttal to opinions such as Ridley’s that place an emphasis on the reproductive pressure behind female orgasm. Ridley and others believed that all sexual behaviour had evolved in response to reproductive pressures, however Lloyd believes that these assumptions are empirically incorrect. To begin with, the hormonal determination of sexual behaviour acknowledges that female
Gender is forced in opposition because the existence of the agency has constructed the binary gender system as definite. It seems that gender is not as clear-cut as it appears, so there is the possibility of having a different repetition act that would eventually come up with a different gender. Butler (1997) states that, “in very character as performative resides the possibility of contesting reified status”. Though, she mentioned that there are restrictions because there is discouragement for when someone does not meet the social expectations and taboos that it gives a limitation on gender, which leads to chastise. That there are hidden threats upon everyone to perform with the gender that were assigned to each individual.
Studies believe that sex refers to the genitals, musculature, body shapes and hormones. Furthermore, we could also imply that sex is culturally constructed; essentially any form of phenomenon constructed can vary from culture to culture. Sex is believed to be the natural bodies, which can be divided into sexes without culture. Therefore, sex doesn’t genuinely dictate gender, but gender itself is the main cause why it is possible for biologist/scientist to identify a person’s sex. Gender is socially constructed, which doesn’t necessarily signify that females and males are the same nor does their culture makes them different.
Gender is put into “masculine” and “feminine” categories while sex is put into “male” and “female”categories. How do gender and sex contribute to the concepts and constructions of masculinity and femininity? Gender and sex have so much to do with masculinity and femininity. Like I said above [Gender is put into “masculine” and “feminine” categories while sex is put into “male” and “female”categories.] Males are considered masculine because they are “rough and tough” and females are considered feminine because of history and women having to act like a “proper lady”.
Ignorance What causes cross-cultural conflicts? In the articles “Sex and Gender” by William Thompson and Joseph Hickey, “Sex, Lies, and Conversation” by Deborah Tannen, and “Identity in Transformation” by Yasmin Ahmed, each will explore the many obstacles people face in their lives and demonstrate how clashes among different cultures are caused by assumptions manifested from expectations. In “Sex and Gender,” William Thompson and Joseph Hickey explain the differences between sex and gender. Most altercations come from the differences in terms of sex and gender that aren’t clear to others, ”Sex is based on biological and physical differences between females and males; gender refers to a cultural understanding of what constitutes masculinity and femininity in a society” (285). Sex is established by genetics whereas gender is shaped by ones particular society at particular times.
How do gender and sex contribute to the concepts and constructions of masculinity and femininity? Gender and sex contribute to the concepts and constructions of masculinity and femininity in many ways. Gender and sex concepts and constructions of masculinity and feminity of being able to tell the difference between the two. They show them as being completely different like males being the protector and the ladies as being caring and emotional Do our concepts of gender and sex contribute to the ways we embrace gender and sex in diversity? I feel that our concepts of gender and sex contribute to the ways we embrace gender and sex in diversity.
The Dialectical Reversal of Otherness: Biology cannot determine the destiny In this paper, I will agree that biology can’t determine the destiny by looking at French Feminist Philosophy. The Dialectical Reversal of Otherness is a situation in history, where a group of people with less power is treated like they belong in the society, and at the same time, treated like they don't belong. There is no denying the fact that the male and female are playing absolutely different roles in our society. In the present world, it is important and necessary to have all of them in order to increase the efficiency no matter in which industry and position. Apart from this, the most significant is that either male or female cannot replace each other.
Culture tends to divide sexes, based on our gender we automatically go into a category. The pattern of dividing gender and limit men and women to a certain way of living could be constructing some people into lifestyles they don't really enjoy. Women are expected to have children and raise a family and take care of her husband. What's wrong with a women not wanting to have children and spend her life traveling. There really isn't anything wrong with that but society frowns upon it.
He discredits the argument that, ”marriage is fundamentally a procreative unit” (Stoddard 738). The government tries to rectify not allowing same sex marriage to be legal because marriage is supposed to be a procreative unit. People should be entitled to love and marry whomever it is that they choose. The government tries to justify their standing on gay marriage by acknowledging the fact that same sex couples would not be able to birth a child together. If this is in fact a valuable reason to prevent someone from marrying, then why doesn’t the government create a law banning all women and men who cannot or will not have children from being able to legally marry.
Gender Stereotypes Gender stereotypes are simplistic generalizations about the gender attributes, differences, and roles of individuals and/or groups. Stereotypes can be positive or negative, but they rarely communicate accurate information about others. When people automatically apply gender assumptions to others regardless of evidence to the contrary, they are perpetuating gender stereotyping. Many people recognize the dangers of gender stereotyping, yet continue to make these types of generalizations. Traditionally, the female stereotypic role is to marry and have children.