Garden City Vs Le Corbusier’s Contemporary City Fo

616 Words3 Pages
Zeynep Sideli April 16, 2012 Assignment 3 Ebenezer Howard’s Garden City Vs Le Corbusier’s Contemporary City for Three Million. Since the time passes, each time needs a new paradigm for city planning and many architect try new concepts and ideas for cities problems. Ebenezer Howard’s Garden City and Le Corbusier’s Contemporary City are most famous innovative ideas for City in early 20th century. Both ideas talk about the better living qualities and solved the old city planning’s problems which didn’t work anymore after the industrial revolution. Health and hygiene are most considerable subjects for urban planning. Since a lot of people were flowed into cities, the cities were hyper concentrated and it started to suffer from lack of infrastructures and green spaces. Ville Contemporaine, Contemporary city by Le Corbusier was a theoretical urban scheme for 3million inhabitants in 1922. It was evoked the town planning. His idea was clear and strict in a rule. City was centralized to a main multiple transportation hub, and zoning was classified clearly by 60 story cruciform skyscrapers for industrial and commercial which were mainly around the rectangular center with garden space, smaller low story hosing blacks with “set-backs” and zigzag shape housing apartment block on the “cellular” system, garden city, public services, park, sports, protected zone and warehouses, industrial city, goods stations the basics principles must follow are these: we must de-congest the centres of our cities, we must augment their density, we must increase the means for getting about. and we must increase parks and open spaces (the city of to-morrow p 166). He decided the location of population that citizens who work and live in it were of the city and suburban dwellers were those who work in the outer industrial zone and who do not come into the city; they live in garden
Open Document