NCLB set forth a certain criteria to be met, but allowed the states to determine how they would accomplish it. Therefore, each state handles assessment and accountability differently. This makes it hard to show success or failure of the programs. Supporters and critics alike can cite research that supports their opinion. My opinion of NCLB is it is flawed, developmentally inappropriate, ill funded, ←and→ leaving more students, teachers, ←and→ schools behind than ever before because The tests have turned into the objective of classroom instruction rather than the measure of teaching ←and→ learning.
Since all students in a school are taking the same test, with respect to grade level, standardized tests provide an accurate comparison across groups. Letting schools form their own tests will produce faulty results. A Tennessee school admitted to “dumbing down” their tests to appear that the students were excelling. A fair and equal opportunity is given to all students by administering equivalent testing conditions. Over the years great improvements have been made with regards to test bias, which has led to more accurate
This is much lower then the students they send to our schools because the percentage of FARM students in elementary are 61%, middle 60%, and high school 48 %( Somerset 2009). The poverty line in
This cut off almost a third of Americans because they had little to no high school education. High school played a big role in getting a career started for women which were considered white collared jobs. “but access to secondary schooling was determined by class and ethnicity.” Therefore, poor people had a low chance of applying and being accepted. The entrance requirements to be a teacher requires 4 years of schooling, a degree, and they also added a minimum grade for the state teachers examination. They had tightened their requirements because careers like doctors, lawyers, and engineers did as well.
Parents are increasingly concerned about the standard of the Thai education system. Those dissatisfied with the poor quality of the Thai government schools transfer their children to private or international schools, but not everyone can afford the cost of these schools. If quality education in Thailand continues to only be the privilege of the wealthy, many unwelcomed social implications will arise. Therefore, Thai authorities must immediately overhaul the country’s education system in order to ensure that all children, regardless of their backgrounds, get the best education possible. This will promote social equality and help prepare the nation’s youth for the competitive 21st century workforce, benefitting each individual and the country’s socio-economic development in today’s globalizing world immensely.
This can affect their education as they will not want to stay on in further education, as they can get a job and make money straight away. ), and Present-time orientation (The w/c believe that you should savour every day, as tomorrow may never come. With this frame of mind, they may think education is a waste of time, as it may not benefit you if tomorrow never comes.) These two sociologists’ theories and practices prove that there are major differences in achievement between classes. However, these theories stereotype, and blame the family too much.
It’s a sad truth when a child’s success is tied to either wealth or blind luck. While the film highlights the many problems with our education system – poor teachers, the teachers union’s influence, financing, economics, and parental involvement – it also offers some ideas on how to change things. It does this by highlighting educators and administrators who recognize the problems and are making significant changes in the education process. The truth is that anyone can succeed if given the right opportunity. Educator Geoffrey Canada is one person making a difference.
Lucas Ancke December 1, 2012 English 101: 3 p.m. Prof. Amanda Ross Waiting for “Superman” Response Davis Guggenheim’s documentary, Waiting for “Superman,” follows five children trying to further their education when they felt like they were not receiving one that they wanted. Most of these children were living in poverty or close to it and could not afford a private school, so they were forced to go to bad quality schools. Guggenheim states that, some of these schools are considered drop-out factories, where over 40% of students don’t graduate. These schools are the reason that that bad neighborhoods develop near these already bad quality schools (Guggenheim). These schools’ bad records are due to their bad teachers.
He wants the best education possible for the young people in America, and it starts with improving the k-12 education system. The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) that was passed could have been a success, but without the proper federal funding, the NCLB failed. Instead of tracking how students are doing by filling out standardized bubble tests, Obama plans on improving the tests for readiness in the workplace (The Blueprint for Change). He feels that schools that are struggling should not be punished for doing poor, but given extra attention to help improve the struggling areas. His plan includes helping teachers increase salary for mentoring younger teachers (The Blueprint for Change).
We may not know the same subjects as previous generations, but we are adapting to the ever changing world around us. Calling us the “Dumbest Generation” is a bit harsh considering that our generation and previous generations were taught in different societies. Our generation is the generation of technology, while the generations before us weren’t exposed to the technologies of today. Of course, no generation is going to admit to being less educated than another generation. Each generation would consider themselves the smartest, but to others that might seem farfetched.