Online communication has become how people communicate with each other. When writing emails or responding to them can be hard to do unless you use good writing etiquette can avoid offending people. Inclusive language is defined as language that avoids the use certain expressions or words that might be considered to exclude a particular group of people. Inclusive language is a key to good writing for readers. He could have avoided offending classmates by proofreading his post before posting.
These quotations are very relevant to me, especially because I am a very expressive or kind of a talkative person. These reminded me that even how good or fancy I talk or say something, without backing it up with a clear action it is pointless. That is why it is better to just do more and talk less like the old saying tell us ‘Walk the talk’. Or the more I talk about something the more I should put a better effort in doing it. You would only prove a point if you back you words with definite and clear actions.
Other factors to consider are: Language - there is no point in talking in computer code if the other party has never used one. Age - For example young kids may not know about a lot of adult subects Possible disabilities – Trying to show something to someone with poor site, it would be better to explain verbally in this case 3.1 Explain how
If technology continues to develop at this rate, people will slowly begin to depend on it just as much as Mildred did. People nowadays forget about the conventional things in life and allow themselves to be consumed by a world of technology. People have now begun to rely on technology such as portable devices for entertainment. This increase in use of technology will cause more people to stop reading for fun and begin experimenting with these new gadgets. Even though these devices come with many ways to read, most people do not use this to their advantage.
* * You do not want to give potential new clients wrong information and details resulting in them not choosing our firm. Furthermore you do not want to give wrong information to clients who are also using our company as they would think we didn’t know what we are doing. *
They have always valued their privacy, which made it interesting to see that they have allowed some of their cultural aspects to be shed to the public. I am not sure how voluntarily that was done, but I am sure that there are a lot of aspects that are missing from the media coverage. The article was not as deep as I wanted it to be in respect to personal accounts. I would have preferred to have more information coming from the Amish perspective in regards to their cultural beliefs and views of treatment. I did benefit from the discussion regarding the development of the program and the important components that were
The seal should not be placed over signatures or over any printed matter on the document. An illegible or improperly placed seal may result in rejection of the document for recordation and result in inconveniences and extra expenses for all those involved. The law allows a limited exception when a notary public may authenticate an official
A criminal or potential criminal will not volunteer this information willingly. This also falls into a civil matter where one does not have to provide personal information because it is a violation of one’s privacy, according to the Constitution. The chances of an identifier being incorrect are almost zero because each person has a distinct value or trait, making it hard to deny. Finger- printing and hand scans are accurate and distinct and require very little computer space this also provides access for many law enforcement officers to deal with unresolved case. Retina or iris scans are high in accuracy for identifying a person but is not commonly used among identifying criminals.
It is written in a first person point of view. Writing with this approach was more effective in this story because it gave a more personal account in the message it is trying to give the reader. It allowed the reader to experience the problem on a personal level through another person’s eyes as opposed to listing facts like the first story did the whole time. Writing it in a first person point of view made it easier for the audience to identify with the author and side with what he is trying to persuade us to believe. We tend to take the story to heart more when it is written in this point of view.
One would say that Lennie didn’t have to kill her, but then again, Lennie did not understand the situation or what was happening. One would also say that he did not have to take things that far but all he wanted to do was make her stop yelling at him. “Now don’t, I don’t want you to yell. You gonna get me in trouble,” is what he told her because all he wanted was for her to stay quiet (Steinbeck 91). He didn’t mean to kill her, but since Lennie does not understand certain things, he also does not know his own strength.