Vol. 3, No. 1. ISSN: 1473-8376 www.hlst.ltsn.ac.uk/johlste
Finding the Hospitality Industry? Or Finding Hospitality Schools of Thought?
Peter Jones (email@example.com) University of Surrey Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK. DOI:10.3794/johlste.31.55 Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education
The aim of this article is to provide an overview of hospitality research and how it has developed over the last thirty years. To do this, the state of hospitality research is briefly reviewed and Veal’s (2002) analysis of leisure studies is presented. Hospitality is then compared with leisure studies in order to identify similarities and differences. This comparison then leads to the identification of alternative schools of thought within hospitality, which are described and critiqued. The article ends with some conclusions about the state of hospitality research. Keywords: hospitality research, schools of thought
This article is prompted by the ongoing debate within this journal between Paul Slattery and Bob Brotherton (Slattery, 2002; Brotherton, 2002a; Slattery, 2003; Brotherton, 2003) under the headline ‘Finding the Hospitality Industry’. Whilst reading this exchange of opinion, I had been in the process of writing an article which I had provisionally titled ‘Hospitality Research: Intellectual Void, Theoretical Crisis, or Mature Complacency?’ This was unashamedly adapted from an article by Veal (2002) which considered how the field of leisure studies had developed over the last 30 to 40 years. Veal writes: Depending on who you read, leisure studies is either in a state of desperate intellectual crisis or basking in a somewhat self-satisfied
I would like to make it clear that this article does not specifically derive from my work on RAE Panel 43. In carrying out their task, such panels make collective, cabinet-style decisions which are then communicated to the institutions who submitted returns. Panel 43 also...