Federalism and the 17th Amendment

852 Words4 Pages
Federalism and the 17th Amendment Why was the 17th Amendment proposed and passed? What was the role of Senator William Lorimer? In other words what were the issues that prompted this amendment and controversy? Prior to the 17th Amendment, the United States Constitution made an assembly where each individual state would have identical representation. The states legislature would be responsible for electing two senators who would serve for 6-year terms. The election of the senators was not necessarily an easy task for the state legislatures. Elections could become deadlocked and vacancies would remain open for extended periods. Further, special interests, and bribery corrupted the process. To remedy this problem, many states adopted the “Oregon System”. States would hold a primary election so the voters could choose the best candidate and in turn, the states legislature would then vote to send the candidate to the senate. Over half of the states embraced the “Oregon System”, however the bribery and corruption continued. This peaked with the 1910 investigation of the election of Senator William Lorimer of Illinois. Lorimer had a reputation for involvement in shady deals, but always seemed to stay clear of any consequences. He was seated by the U.S. Senate in June of 1909, after many months of deadlock in the Illinois state legislature. Just a year later, the Chicago Tribune reported that one of the legislatures claimed he was paid $1,000 to cast a vote for Lorimer. The investigation uncovered more bribes of up to $100,000 to buy his election. Finally, in 1912, Lorimer was banished from the senate. The corrupt events of Lorimar’s election and expulsion from the senate, lead to the adoption of the 17th Amendment. What is Dean’s analysis of the 17th Amendment? In John Dean’s analysis of the 17th Amendment, he is making the case for it to be repealed.
Open Document