Favazza & Odom Response

2307 Words10 Pages
By Charles Tran Part I: Response to Literature 1. Children are impressionable and they form attitudes about people at an early age. Favazza & Odom (1996) examined the reliability of the Acceptance Scale for Kindergartners (ASK) and found it to be reliable in assessing kindergarteners’ attitudes toward children with disabilities. Favazza & Odom (1997) found that children are more likely to develop positive attitudes toward children with disabilities if they have direct and indirect experiences with them early in life. In their examination of the effects of an intervention package, they also determined that the attitudes of young children can be altered through social contact and use of children’s books. 2. Sixteen kindergarten participants were placed in a separate school in which children with disabilities were not enrolled. This no-contact group was their control group. The children in this group had neither direct nor indirect contact with children with disabilities. The initial pretest scores on the ASK indicated that kindergarten children in all three groups had a low level of acceptance for children with disabilities. The scores from the posttest and follow-up test for the no-contact group, however, confirmed that levels of acceptance were found only in the high-contact group. By having a separate no-contact group, they were able to demonstrate that children who have less or no exposure to people with disabilities are less accepting of children with disabilities than those who have more exposure. Although the no-contact group is realistic in that it is possible for a school to have no children with disabilities, it is not as common today. By law, public schools must provide appropriate education to all children, including those with learning or physical disabilities. In addition, several laws give students with disabilities the right to

More about Favazza & Odom Response

Open Document