Mere-exposure effect predicts that individuals we enjoy are those we network with or see frequently (Feenstra, 2011). For example, many cases of relationships from the workplace develop due to this effect (Meyer, 2013). Generally individuals want a relationship with an attractive partner who is near to them in physical appeal, also considered as matching hypothesis (Feenstra, 2011). For example, couples may share distinctive physical, emotional, and/or psychological resemblances. Therefore, most individuals turn to their partners who have similar interests or values and promote equality (Feenstra, 2011).
The reward/need satisfaction theory suggests that people form romantic relationships because they feel they are rewarded by being with that person. The things we find rewarding tend to reflect our unmet needs, for example the need for company or financial security. Mutual attraction occurs when each partner meets the other person’s needs. One person might have the need for financial security, while another craves company. Stimuli that is rewarding produces positive feelings in us, and stimuli that is punishing produces negative feelings.
This is true because in order to be in a romantic relationship, there is not a required amount of commitment necessary. Another example of one of these combinations would be infatuated love. This kind of love occurs when a person is very passionate about someone without feeling a sense of intimacy or commitment. Infatuated love can be fueled by an obsession. Many people view infatuated love as irresponsible, immature and blind love built solely on unreasonable passion, which could simply stem from a sexual attraction.
We are more likely to form a relationship with those people who are associated with pleasant event e.g. we are more likely to like someone when we are in a happy mood opposed to unhappy. Support for this theory comes from Griffitt and Guay, they found that higher ratings were given when the experimenter had positively evaluated the participants, thus showing the importance of positive stimuli in relationship formation. Although, the reward / need satisfaction theory doesn’t take into account cultural and gender differences in the formation of romantic relationships. Lott suggests that in many cultures are more focused on the needs of others rather than receiving reinforcement.
Describe and evaluate two or more theories of the formation of romantic relationships (9 marks + 16 marks) January 2011 One theory that outlines the formation of relationships is the reward/ need satisfaction theory that was developed by Byrne and Clore (1970). The theory suggests that we form a relationship because the presence of a particular individual is associated with reinforcement. This is because rewarding stimuli creates positive feelings and these stimuli may be people. These people therefore make us happy, so, due to operant conditioning, we seek to adopt behaviours that lead to a desirable outcome and avoid those that lead to an undesirable outcome. Therefore, the presence of an individual produces positive reinforcement as they have a more attractive appeal.
First, in describing autonomy/connection it is the ways that people desire for personal identity and space but also have a longing to be together and to belong to another person. Next, the novelty/predictability dynamic infers that we want for new and exciting things within our relationships yet we also wish to keep a routine and predictable relationship. Finally, the dynamic of openness/closedness describes the struggle in relationships for our desire to share different parts of our lives with others but also wanting to keep certain parts of our lives separate and private. Mattingly, Oswald, and Clark (2001) studied the importance of understanding why some people are more effective at maintaining relationships and how important that understanding is in helping people who are struggling with interpersonal issues. Their research included integrating individual differences such as relational-interdependent self-construal (RISC) and communal orientation and how this integration can benefit the relationship process.
You hold it together with sex, and use anger in arguements to try to force the other person to understand, rather then calmly explain so that they can understand. If anger becomes the tool in your relationship it will either end it, or lead to an unhelathy relationship. However I belive that if you two can learn to talk and express your hurts things can work out into a beautiful relationship. You two have so much in common, and have very real feelings for each other. And ill be around as long as it is conveient for
A person who experiences this type of love is willing to give up just about anything to make the one they’re interested in happy. The person experiencing this type of love is known to value his or her love interest more than him or herself. This type of love also has an extreme vulnerability to potential abuse. The recipient of this type of love has the ability to take advantage of the person who’s so willing to please them and potentially take them for granted. This type of love tends to occur in those with low self-esteem and those who gain confidence in pleasing their love interest.
Chapter 8: Conformity, Compliance, and Obedience - Social influence o Changes in behaviour caused by other people - Conforming behaviour occurs for two principal reasons: o Informational influence • When people are influence by others because of a desire to be correct and to obtain valid information • Reflects that people often rely on others as a source of information o Normative influence • When people are influenced by others to gain reward or to avoid punishment • Disagree with others judgments or beliefs, but proceed in an attempt to be liked or avoid conflict - These can occur simultaneously - We often want to please other people (normative influence) whose judgments we seek (informational influence) Conformity o Most
Signature Themes RelatorRelator describes your attitude toward your relationships. In simple terms, the Relator theme pulls you toward people you already know. You do not necessarily shy away from meeting new people—in fact, you may have other themes that cause you to enjoy the thrill of turning strangers into friends—but you do derive a great deal of pleasure and strength from being around your close friends. You are comfortable with intimacy. Once the initial connection has been made, you deliberately encourage a deepening of the relationship.