To determine the fairness and impartiality of the Chamberlain case, we need to assess the role of the media, the nature of the evidence at the trial and the police investigation. Assessing these would then show that the Chamberlains did not receive fair treatment due to the inconsistences in the justice system and the public prejudice on society.
SMART goals When establishing our goals we can use the SMART acronym to identify the specific information we will need for the planning stage. S = SPECIFIC Goals need to be something specific in order for us to be able to visualise them. Often we set goals that are so loose, it's nearly impossible to judge whether we achieve them or not. For example, a statement like "I will lose weight" is too vague. How will you know if and when you've reached your goal?
Eyewitness Testimony Essay There are many factors that contribute to the accuracy of an eyewitness’ testimony in a court case, resulting in the failure of memory. These factors can include the observer’s state of mind, their expectations, their focus of attention at the time, the suddenness and stressfulness of the situation, and differences in the race or age of the witness and the accused. Memory is a selective and constructive process. Old elements of the memory can fade or be lost, while new elements are unconsciously selected and mixed into a recollection until it constructs a completely different story, and the witness it not even aware of the fact. When an onlooker witnesses a crime, the information they take in will first be sent to their sensory memory in its ‘raw’ form.
The Magistrate also heard evidence from the defendants’ legal agent 3. for consideration. Prosecutors’ charges against the defendant were proven, and the defendant is found guilty, without a conviction noted on the defendants’ criminal record, and a punishment at the Magistrates discretion, is then delivered by the Magistrate. The two police prosecutors sat opposite each other at the left end of the bar table, one having his back to the Magistrate. Their role was to present the evidence against the defendant to the Magistrate, and the charges that the defendant had been charged with, and under what section they had been charged, and at times withdrawing charges after consultation with the defendants’ legal agent. I observed the police prosecutors consulting the defendants’ legal agent on many occasions discussing alternatives to a prison sentence and what the prosecutors felt was fair in way of punishment for this defendant.
Prosecutors are responsible to make sure the guilty person is prosecuted and that innocent people are protected from unwarranted prosecution. Prosecutors decide which types of plea bargains to enter and can ask the court to dismiss the charges. Prosecutors have more discretion than any other legal person including judges. A prosecutor’s position is much more difficult than portrayed on television. On television, the prosecutor, or ADA comes in tries the case and leaves.
Jury Nullification Jury selection plays a significant role in the criminal justice system. Their primary role of the jury lies within the courtroom setting during criminal proceedings. These individuals are charged with the responsibility of hearing testimony from the prosecution and defense and also evaluating any evidence brought before the court. Their understanding and interpretation of all testimony and evidence greatly determine the final result of the trial, the verdict. In many circumstances a jury may dismiss the testimony and evidence and inject their own personal opinions regarding the law.
Eyewitness Testimony By: Victoria Negron PSY 101-01 Eye witness testimonies form the bedrock of most judicial processes around the world. They make a solid impression on a jury, which has the exclusive role of ascertaining the credibility and veracity of the testimonies and make a verdict based on the truth they hold. This is because perjury is criminal and can subvert the integrity of a trial. Recognizing how fallible witness memories are, is paramount for those involved in the judicial process since trials circulate around factual determinations of whom to believe. The human memory has a propensity to recall erroneous events and even details that did not happen.
“Different prosecutors in the state have different attitudes,” Tidmarsh said. “The arbitrariness in that sense of the death penalty is, to me, stunning. It’s not the quality of the act [that determines whether someone is put to death] … In many circumstances, it is the quality of the person who decides whether or not to seek the death penalty.” The judicial system deludes all involved to believe they are not responsible for putting someone to death, Tidmarsh
It is because of the gross misinterpretations of this law that prevents all involved from getting a fair trial as in the Alexander, Giles and Landry cases. It encourages unlawful behavior with a crutch for assailants to lean on just like George Zimmerman and Michael Dunn. It also undermines this country's law enforcement and judicial system. Sadly, it rips justice away from victims' families. While I do not personally feel the Stand Your Ground law should be abolished, I am adamant that the law needs to be revised.
First you have the Prosecution. The responsibility of the prosecution is to prove that without a shadow of a doubt that the defendant committed the crime. Im sure there are times that the prosecution does not think the defendant is not guilty but it is there moral right to keep the trial going and prove their case. It has got to be difficult for the prosecution to know that because of the case they have built against a person could decide the rest of their life. Lets get to the Defense.