Extent of Older Age Discrimination in Public and Private Sectors

328 Words2 Pages
This study is an attempt to discover the extent of age discrimination in the public and private sectors of Singapore. In particular, this study will measure the extent through the Retirement Age Act and the Re-employment Act implemented by Singapore’s government. If either sector fails to enforce these acts, there will be a basis to call for a closer examination of the reasons they dismiss government legislation. Age discrimination is still prevalent in today’s society especially in Singapore where life-long employment is not practiced (Tay 95). Since the 1980s, Singapore’s demographic trends towards an old population as the result of a campaign implemented in the 1960s to prevent overpopulation (Foo 10). The worrying trend led to a change in the government’s policy. Yet, despite the government’s encouragement for Singaporeans to have three or more children, the demographic remains unchanged. As a result, in order to relieve the burden of those who are working to support the elderly, the government has begun to encourage the idea of extending employment of older workers by increasing “the mandatory retirement age from 55 to 60 and thereafter to 65” (Tay 95). However, regardless of the various legislations proposed in favour of the ageing population, workers aged 50 and above still face difficulties in recruitment and promotion. Hence, the research into age discrimination in Singapore will potentially assist the government in making appropriate legislations that will help ease the discrimination faced by older workers. Old workers are notably underrepresented in the workforce. Some may face age discrimination as they are totally unaware of the government legislation that protects their interests. They can be discriminated for their low productivity rate and lack of acquired abilities. However, recently “many observers say employer attitudes will change”
Open Document