Murray and Ungar Synthesis In the many recent debates about how to approach higher education, one issue that has constantly appears is the question of students benefiting from a liberal arts based education. Some argue that a liberal arts education is helpful in teaching students the basic life skills, others claim that a more specific field of study is necessary in order to b successful in life. In Ungar’s essay “the New Liberal Arts”, he claims that with a liberal arts education, students can benefit tremendously when they receive their jobs. In Murray’s essay “Are Too Many People Going to College”, he proclaims that a liberal arts degree is not highly recommended because the more difficult careers want students to take classes that are more specific to a job. Sanford J. Ungar and Charles Murray both conduct and display their own opinion towards the facts they learned through their own strenuous research.
The more prepared a person is to face the similarities and differences, the more successful they will be in the long run, because College and high school is totally different. High School and College are both educational grounds for students to grow and enrich their lives with knowledge and power. Both places are full of experiences and filled with a lot of memories. They are both run by the government. Both play an important role in making a person into a talented individual and a member of a society.
The major questions today are “does liberal arts education better prepare you for a career than a regular institution?” or “is liberal arts education a negative because it makes you learn about more than just what you’re doing in the future?” Liberal arts education is not only good for your career but also for you as a person and knowing more than just what you’re going to get paid for. Liberal arts education provides you with the basic skills needed to be a successful critical thinker. “During the Renaissance, the term was interpreted more broadly to mean all of those studies that impart a general, as opposed to be vocational or specialized education. These correspond rather closely to the interpretation used in most undergraduate colleges today, although the curriculum of the latter is more flexible than that of the Renaissance University.” (The Columbia Encyclopedia). What I got from this piece was that when it comes to liberal arts education there is many sub categories.
Education and school are also agents of socialisation although it is secondary socialisation. Schools help shape our identities by putting us in large social situations and also by using the hidden curriculum to teach us norms and values. Our peers and social group play a huge role in shaping our identity through what music we listen too, what clothes we wear, the leisure activities we do, this leads to the development of sub cultures. Functionalists, Marxists and
A sensible idea indeed: America is no doubt a society of diverse cultures, and this diversity is increasing every instant. The upcoming generation requires more skills to live and communicate in this ilk of society. Studying other cultures in school time can be of great help in this regard. Firstly, the motive of school education is not to produce career oriented students, but to produce better human beings who can live and share the world with others on better terms. Keeping this in mind, students should be made to study subjects that can help them understand their surroundings, and their neighbors.
I realized some of the results of the coeducational schooling since I was in the middle school so, I like to do some researches and find more information about it. I read some articles and statistics about it but I would like to know more and realize how this issue affects our educational life. I found many resources about this topic and there are many articles explain the affects of the coeducational schooling. There are some positive effects for the coeducation, however, there are some negative affect that could impede the educational life and decrease the educational level. So that, I asked these questions to find the best answers to help me solve this issue and overcome it.
Some schools that are already taking only boys or girls such as boarding or private schools have proved that their achievements are way high when they are separate. Scholastic Aptitude Test scores are quite different, and their further performances such as in college showed how they have prepared and achieved in formal institutions. Each boy and girl can create synergy effects when they are being with same sex because they are easily to access and share about scholastic issues. Above the subsequent argument, the second reason is about the circumstance of education. Many schools are decided whether they are leading schools or not based on so-called mood or circumstance.
The impact on the personality of the individual, it has the characteristics of participation in the life of the community. The variety of contacts, relationships and active participation in the life of the surrounding general give shape to the human personality. There are two types of social structure, macro and micro which allows the individual to notice, whatever man is constantly in contact, which affects the shape of humans’ personality. One of the most important perspectives of sociological theories is the distinction between structural and social action. Structural action, in other words structuralism, is a perspective which is concerned with the overall structure of society and sees individual behavior molded by social institutions like the family, the educations, the mass media and work.
Dress Codes in Schools Kelly Mennillo Com/220 Due: 4/22/12 Kelly Munoz Some people believe that our schools should require their students to adapt to a dress code to improve student behavior, enhance students’ self-confidence, and reduce differences among socioeconomic levels. Others may say that policies enforcing dress codes, or requiring school uniforms violate students’ First Amendment rights, and suppress individuality. The argument over school dress codes and school-uniform policies continue to rage in the meeting rooms, administrative officers, and classrooms of public schools throughout the country. School officials place dress code policies so there will be orderly dressing amongst the students’. Dress codes are important, but they are troublesome at the same time.
Technology is a strong importance in our everyday live and in society, but it brings a strong division between poor and wealthy, smart and illiterate, active and passive citizens. Technology in education is a great resource to have for students’ education because it helps expand their horizon in learning, keeps them modern and up to date in the world around them, and helps them develop social skills and build connections needed to stay active and involved in society. Technology in education definitely helps and benefits students’ education, but can also hurt them if not used properly. Research has shown that students tend to learn better online than face to face with a teacher, but even better when they have online access as well as face-to-face with a teacher. (Project RED, 2010) The real issue is that some schools/ district restrict students from using technology in school to support their education.