Everyday Use by Alice Walker

1371 Words6 Pages
Esthetic Heritage vs. Culture Heritage A response to Alice Walker's “Everyday Use” “Everyday Use”, by Alice Walker, is set in the late 1960s or early 70s and tells the story of a mother and her two daughters--Maggie and Dee and their conflicting ideas about their identities and ancestry. The mother narrates the story of the day one daughter, Dee, visits from college and clashes with the other daughter, Maggie, over the possession of an heirloom quilt. Through the description of Dee's visit, the author shows how the two daughters' perspectives and appreciation of their heritage differ and how it compares to the position they hold today. Maggie thinks that culture and heritage are involved in everyday lives. Dee, from the other point of view, thinks that culture and heritage are to be valued only for their artistic appeal and to be observed from a distance. I find it interesting that Dee suddenly wants her heritage with all that passion but simply focuses on the esthetic and fashionable, rather than on the meaning behind the heritage. It reminds me of every person who claims Irish heritage on St. Patrick's Day and wants to be more Irish than a shamrock. However, chances are that they don't even know how to locate Ireland on a map. So throughout this essay, I'm going to express my thoughts on why I agree with Dee's perspective on how culture and heritage are invaluable and priceless for their artistic appeal (esthetic heritage) and also concur with Maggie's stand that heritage should be a living dynamic part of the culture and to be put into everyday use (culture heritage). To a certain point, I agree with Maggie and Mama's point of view on why culture and heritage should be put into everyday use. The story opens with Mama and Maggie waiting in the yard for Dee to visit. Mama is the narrator so we can get a clear view on the way she understands things and how she
Open Document