Ethics of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

789 Words4 Pages
Ethics of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Bombing A look into the morality of using the first and only atomic bombs in battle. Background: On August 6th 1945 the very first atomic bomb was used in an act of war. The bomb was dropped over the city of Hiroshima, Japan instantaneously killing 70,000 people. Three days later, on August 9th, the second and last atomic bomb ever used as a weapon was dropped on Nagasaki, Japan killing roughly 40,000 people. Within the first four months after the bombings, thousands of other Japanese citizens lost their lives due to complications from burns, radiation poisoning, and other injuries. It is estimated that between 180,000 to 230,000 people, mostly civilians, died during and after the use of the atomic bombs. From the day after to 70 years later the bombings have been a major topic of discussion and debate between philosophers and scholars alike. Just War Theory: Set of conditions under which a resort or act of war is morally legitimate. Among the proposed conditions for the just resort to war are that the cause be just, that the authority undertaking the war be competent, that all peaceful alternatives be exhausted, and that there is a reasonable hope of success. Two of the most important conditions for the just conduct of war are that the force used be “proportional” to the just cause the war is supposed to serve and that military personnel be discriminated from civilians who should not be killed. Total War: A war in which one or more of the engagers uses all available resources and population to fight. Support The number one reason supporters have for the use of the atomic bomb is that it saved massive amounts of lives in the long run for both the Americans and Japanese. The American military were planning an event nicknamed “Operation Downfall,” which was basically an all out attack on the Japanese home front. The operation was
Open Document