Discuss the difficulties of studying patients who do not adhere to medical advice. (15) A problem with studying patients, who do not adhere, is which approach to take. Is it their social or cognitive processes or is it caused by biological side effects? Looking at just one approach can help researchers to be specific. However, this is causes them to be reductionist.
He scores high on a measure of paranoia, though he does not reach a clinical level. Do you think it is worth spending session time sharing this information and explaining its meaning to him, or do you think it would it be best to focus on other things? If you were this patient, would you want to know everything learned in the assessment? • Think about how a clinician should balance the patient’s right to know against the “expense” of full disclosure, including the communication of information that may not be useful and is difficult to explain. With these thoughts in
He scores high on a measure of paranoia, though he does not reach a clinical level. Do you think it is worth spending session time sharing this information and explaining its meaning to him, or do you think it would it be best to focus on other things? If you were this patient, would you want to know everything learned in the assessment? • Think about how a clinician should balance the patient’s right to know against the “expense” of full disclosure, including the communication of information that may not be useful and is difficult to explain. With these thoughts in
Simpler questions would be “Is Dr. Smith’s intentional practise of omitting important information relevant to his client’s treatment ethical?” or “Is Dr. Smith’s failure to report his client’s actions to the authorities morally justifiable?” Both would be good questions, but I believe the question the study guide asks us to consider embrace both of these questions. The possible answers to the question are “yes” or “no”. I will be using rule-based utilitarianism and Kantian deontology to analyse this case study. There is not enough information to consider act-based utilitarianism: Act-based utilitarianism essentially says that one should perform that act which will bring about the greatest amount of good (“happiness”) over bad for everyone affected by the act. Each situation and each person must be assessed on their own merits (Thiroux, 2004, p. 42).
From the way that I have interrupted that if the participates are forced into going through with the research it could have a very negative effect on the outcome and will cause data to be wrongfully interrupted. The informed consent is necessary for ethical research because it outlines what the researchers are doing and what is expected of the participates. It states what risks that are involved and they are able to back out at any time they wish if they are in fear or just do not want to help out anymore. After they are done with the study the participates need to be debriefed where if they are taking a medication that is being researched they are informed if they received the actual drug or a placebo, also at this time they are given an explanation of the study and the procedures that were involved. I will share with the class that I had my son involved in a drug study for ADHD about 9 years ago; it was for the patch that is offered now.
It leads to better outcomes and it creates better patient and family satisfaction. The FCC’s basic concepts are based on respect and dignity where health care providers listen to what the patient and the patient’s family’s perspectives and opinions are. Patient and family knowledge, values, beliefs, and cultural backgrounds are very important to consider incorporating into the planning and delivery of health care. Patients and families are encouraged to decision making depending
Analysis of Ethical Dilemma PSY/610 Introduction It is important for psychologists and other professionals to demonstrate ethical behavior when working with clients/patients, students, and colleagues. Unfortunately ethical behavior is not always applied in situations where it is appropriate and as a result those individuals on the receiving end are treated unfairly. This paper will attempt to confront a situation where two graduate assistants are receiving unethical treatment from a researcher who is currently leading the three studies they are working on. This paper will include ethical considerations for the scenario and notate the ethical violations made on the behalf of the senior researcher. Ethical Considerations Thinking before we act or speak is crucial while in the workplace.
My leadership plan for Mai is that she assists in the market research, development, and implementation of strategy Leroy Washington – My personality assessment score is ISTP. The relationship theory would also apply to me because I am interested in the performance of the group and I have high ethical and moral standards. Since this project calls for to be the manager appointed leader of this project, my leadership plan for me is to participate in the research, marketing,, development, and implementation of strategies for the new department to not only reach its target market but to also be successful in its desired market for as long as
Precipitants should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him or her to make an understanding and enlightened decision (Freeman S. 2000). In this paper Team B will summarize our reflections and thoughts on ethical standards for human research. I.) Three basic ethical principles for human research are: • Respect for autonomy, which requires that those who are capable of deliberation about their personal choices should be treated with respect for their capacity for self-determination. • Beneficence refers to the ethical obligation to maximize benefits and to minimize harms and wrongs.
The research is written as such that the best interest of the service user is considered within the research highlighting the value principles of the researchers themselves, where there is consideration for equality, dignity and respect. Although the article does not conclude any evidence outcomes, it is still important to note that evidence based practice is often the basis for decision making and implementing research findings into practice. Evidence based research involves identifying the best available answer to questions that are raised on an identified need albeit that of a service user or organisation. It involves a process of evaluating the evidence and its effectiveness in informing practice and intervention (McLaughlin, 2007). One could argue that evidence based practice bridges the gap between research and practice with its focus on outcomes.