On a dark and stormy night, Able, age 13 and Bonnie, age 15, discussed how great it would be if they had some money to spend on their weekend trip to the beach. They consulted Clyde, age 21, knowing that he was very sneaky and knowing he would easily come up with a plan for money. The three agreed that they would go to the home of their neighbor (Nelly hereafter), take a $2000 vase from the living room, and sell it for $750, leaving them each with $250 dollars. All agreed that Clyde would get the vase. Clyde immediately walked to the neighbor’s front door and opened the window.
Anh describes the public reaction of him appearing on the series “ a week after the series had finished, I was in the bank paying off my credit card, holding about eight hundred in my hand suddenly a hand grabbed me from behind. The arm spun me around it was an old lady “Tango with me Anh “she said I was so surprised and relieved I shuffled around with her as the bank staff chuckled. “I voted for you Anh” she explained. I realised how absurd and wonderful it was that total strangers had spent money on me to keep me in a dancing show and I will never know who you all are. But I will be forever grateful”.
Simpler questions would be “Is Dr. Smith’s intentional practise of omitting important information relevant to his client’s treatment ethical?” or “Is Dr. Smith’s failure to report his client’s actions to the authorities morally justifiable?” Both would be good questions, but I believe the question the study guide asks us to consider embrace both of these questions. The possible answers to the question are “yes” or “no”. I will be using rule-based utilitarianism and Kantian deontology to analyse this case study. There is not enough information to consider act-based utilitarianism: Act-based utilitarianism essentially says that one should perform that act which will bring about the greatest amount of good (“happiness”) over bad for everyone affected by the act. Each situation and each person must be assessed on their own merits (Thiroux, 2004, p. 42).
If these two components can be proven, then there is a wrongful termination case because Newcorp breaches the contract. However, Pat has to take the proper step to verify these two facts by doing the following: Pat must write a letter to Newcorp requesting a written reason to why he is being let go. Pat must keep in mind that he is being laid off, not fired, because he is being offered severance pay, meaning there may not be fault on his side or performance. If Newcorp responses and confirm that Pat is being let go because of his performance then Pat may have a case
Joe response to Bill is to tell him that he needs time to notified UNWEAR management teams to get approval on the contract due to they are still negotiating the deal so the invitation for the trip will not be the best ideas to say yes to his proposal until he gets word from the management team, UNWEAR policy states that it is unethical to the company for employees to contact or discuss business without the approval of UNWEAR management team. At this time it is best for Joe to stay quiet until he receive his next step from the upper managers this is just in case Bill want to change the prices like Joe did before to get a lower prices to win the contract that’s what put him in the bad spot in UNWEAR Company even though Joe wants to renew UNWEAR contract with Bill Hotel (Steps in the Ethical Decision-Making Process ). What ethical theory supports how you think Joe should respond to this invitation? UNWEAR the Company Joe work for Ethical policy, which is personified in their following standards, is a way to ethical decision-making. UNWEAR is faithful to uncompromising honor in everything we do and in any way we related to others as well as outside companies.
The victim will have to go through the court process, which in many ways can cause the person to be victimized again. When a plea bargain is done just so it can get off the “docks” it can but a negative perception from the community of the justice system. Plea bargaining is a win/win situation neither of the counsel’s lose. The judge’s caseload is lessened because there is no need for a trial. With the defendant they get a shot at leniency from the judge.
That means we may say we're all about doing the right thing -- and even believe it. But when doing the right thing has too many negative consequences for us, we may reframe the situation to favor our own interests. We find a way to justify our self-serving decisions. Sounds like Penn State's leaders, doesn't it? It's why this statement from the Freeh Report is so haunting: "Although concern to treat the child abuser humanely was expressly stated, no such sentiments were ever expressed by them for Sandusky's victims."
However, if everything came together appropriately, Goldstein could forcibly close the discount and earn an exceptional return when he has free reign over the fund’s strategy. Getting into this position is very difficult for an activist investor such as Goldstein because it required pleasing many parties with conflicting interests. Management of the funds would be reluctant to reduce the fund size in any way as it would cut into their annual fees. Shareholders were most interested in an effective return on their investments. And, investors in
Date: 31/01/2014 [pic] Topic: Virtuous Exemplar! Business Administration Contemporary Ethics Prepared by: Ina Koci Submitted to: Kate Hummer “If you are kind, people may accuse you of selfish, ulterior motives: Be kind anyway. If you are successful you will win some false friends and true enemies: Succeed anyway. If you are honest and frank people will try to cheat you: Be honest anyway. What you spend years building, someone could destroy overnight: Build anyway.
It would appear that his action towards me is a command by his boss, but there is no concrete proof that this was the case. How can he afford to just hand over a large sum of money just to get rid of me? It is possible that what I saw the other night and my manager placing me to head this initiative is no coincidence. Smuggling was evident in the pier due to the lack of solid system of procedures in clearing out shipments. For me, this is the right thing to do given the considerations that I have.